On 08/18/2010 03:54 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
But my main attitude is let's not sweat the small stuff. If there's
good reason not to release the script, and there seems to be, then
let's not release it. It's causing more confusion than it's worth.
+1
I hope you didn't feel I was sweating small stuff. I wasn't trying to
obstruct a release or otherwise create a roadblock. But I have seen
lots of projects get confused about source versus non-source in
releases; at the extreme, leaving out sources and releasing binaries.
So I think it's worth explaining ASF principles, in this case, that
releases should include all the the source code.
I think if you hadn't said "nononono, Doug", but rather what Bryan said,
"I think it's pretty clearly non-source." then our discussion would have
been much shorter. I wanted Bryan to think about whether it was source,
and he did. I didn't want to make that judgement for him.
Doug
