On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:21:51PM -0400, Christian Lavoie wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Anthony Molinaro > <antho...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > > I would say however you would like to manage the backlog is fine. I'm > > I meant the existing issues that have patches that have been pending for > months: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-652 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-743 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-787 > > I have the time and incentive. Anything I can help with?
Probably dusting those patches off and making sure they work would be nice. > > not really at all familiar with haskell, but if you can find at least > > one other thrift person (probably by asking on the users list, or maybe > > one of the other commits knows enough) to try out your patches I think > > we'd probably be able to commit them. > > > > If you can manage to integrate the building and testing of haskell > > in the make system we might even be able to elevate it to a language > > which is automatically built and tested. > > Anything other than patching autotools and the usual suspects? Nope, that's about it, you should look at how the other languages get added with configure options and mimic it (see configure.ac and lib/Makefile.am). > > So please feel free to create new issues and split your changes up, > > or just reuse current ticket. > > THRIFT-901 created for the bits not redundant. I'll just try the > existing patches for where it was redundant and comment on the > appropriate issues as "tried it, it works, please commit" as > appropriate. Sounds good. -Anthony -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Anthony Molinaro <antho...@alumni.caltech.edu>
