Uh.... you have the source. Of *course* you can extend the language. And the opposition of XML based versus RPC based seems very strange. One is syntax, the other is implementation or design philosophy.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Zhan Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > > 5. Service description language Is the service description language > extensible with our own attributes? Is it XML based or is it oriented > to a developer? Is there any tooling for authoring the service > description language? > A: No, we can not extend the IDL with our own attributes. It is RPC > based. No tooling provided. -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve 111 West Evelyn Ave. Ste. 202 Sunnyvale, CA 94086 www.deepdyve.com 408-773-0110 ext. 738 858-414-0013 (m) 408-773-0220 (fax)
