You might also consider JFlex (http://jflex.de/) -- I haven't done much with
either JavaCC or JFlex other than modify existing grammars, but the Lucene
guys moved from JavaCC to JFlex for their tokenizer -
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966.  If I remember correctly,
two benefits were (1) faster tokenizing, and (2) simpler grammar definition.
 Performance probably isn't an issue for Thrift, but a simpler grammar may
be.  As I said, I can't give a good comparison but maybe someone else on the
mailing list can.
-chris

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Bryan Duxbury <[email protected]> wrote:

> It seems like there's some consensus on a JavaCC based compiler. Should we
> open an JIRA issue and start to explore feasibility?
> -Bryan
>
>
>

Reply via email to