On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Bryan Duxbury <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe we should change setRecvTimeout to setRecvTimeoutMs to make that
> clearer?

Good idea; less ambiguous.

-- 
Phillip B Oldham
[email protected]
+44 (0) 7525 01 09 01

Reply via email to