On 6/29/05, Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rain Viigipuu wrote: > > 2) Add a separate 'Thumbnail view'. I discovered this in Windows > > Explorer recently. > > > > Definitely this one is better. Actually I think Windows Explorer in > > WinXP has done it really nice (for example - i have set the thumbnails > > view to my wallpapers directory, and it remembers it. Everywhere else > > i use details view as it shows me the file type, size, last modified > > and other useful info what i need to manage with my files). > > > > If the thumbnails are used as file icons (mime icons), then the icons > > should be large to recognize what file it is(and still usually are > > they too small to recognize what file it is). And then if i had a lot > > of files in one direcotory - it would be really hard to manage with > > them. > > > > So i think, by default, it list/icon view, there should be mime icons > > as they look better in small size and are faster. But it would be nice > > to have a thumbnail view like win explorer has - so when i have a > > directory full of pictures and i want take a quick look - so i can > > change th e view. The thumbnails size is pretty good in windows - so i > > think we could take it from there :) > > This would be that we need to remember the chosen view per directory. We > can do that, no problem, just the question: Should we actually do it > that way? > > Benedikt
I also vote for this, I really liked this feature in the WindowsExplorer and think it is very usefull to set certain directories to the styles they fit best in (according to the end-user ofcourse :-)) _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
