-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
sofar wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:15:44 -0300, hernux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't seen the code, but I guess that he is not calling system
>> cp/mv commands.. so, implementation may be different from what I
>> said before..
>
> Calling a shell command to do mv/cp from a C program is kind of
> awkward, and often a bad thing - you have no idea what is happening
> while a copy is progressing for instance. In any case a proper
> implementation in C is not as simple as you think, which is why the
> current code is 'as is'.
Actually the implementation is pretty simple: the rename()[0] C call,
and fall back to the normal copy-and-delete method if that fails (src
and dest are on different file systems, etc.). But it's easy to see why
Benny just used the copy-and-delete method for now since it was already
implemented for normal copying.
-b
[0] I'm assuming that rename() will always fail gracefully: i.e.,
there's no situation where a failed rename() will cause data loss. I'm
pretty sure it's safe, but I haven't read the manpage in a while.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDx/Bj6XyW6VEeAnsRAiVdAKCW7xAd013z2bxcB35nhlfsfrovVwCg0xQG
i/w/eaK95SGbiJLfAMZqgnI=
=RrHx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Thunar-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
