Stefan Stuhr wrote: > If Thunar only will support ~/.Trash/ as trash folder, then the trash > shouldn't be used for files on removable media. Besides that, ~/.Trash/ > is definitely better than no trash at all.
I keep hearing that -- but I don't believe it. A broken trash implementation is just going to result in Benny being flooded with unnecessary bug reports. No trash is better than broken trash. Users have a certain expectation of how trash works. If it doesn't work that way, they are going to crib. For example, if a user uses Thunar to delete 10GB of isos in his 100GB /movies partition, he really won't like it when his 10GB /home suddenly fills up. Benny -- stick to an action script for trash until you can implement the full trash spec. My 2c, -- b _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
