On 2/24/06, Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> daniele favara wrote:
> >>>yep ...
> >>>
> >>>it seems that with newer dbus and hal ... there is even another way to do
> >>>that,
> >>>
> >>>[org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Volume]
> >>>
> >>>http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/2005-December/004077.html
> >>>
> >>>i was thinking it may cause problems on distros that doesn't use it
> >>>... maybe Suse and fedora|red hat ?
> >>>
> >>>http://mail.gnome.org/archives/utopia-list/2006-January/msg00002.html
> >>>
> >>>it was maily to tell Benny about this :)
> >>
> >>This doesn't seem to be very useful on its own. We could use
> >>gnome-mount, which in turn uses the HAL methods, but afterall pmount
> >>still looks a lot more useful for this purpose.
> >
> > i agree .. it was just to tell you. If i'm not wrong in some threads
> > you were talking about fedora way of mounting devices ... i think that
> > is.
>
> Uhm, if they're going to drop fstab-sync, there'll be two choices left
> for Fedora:
well .. they'll not use fstab-sync but a new features of hal
"For the Mount() method, the name for the mount point directory in /media
can be specified. Also the usual otions passed to the mount call can be
passed as a single string:
/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/volume_uuid_3e999973_00c9_4917_9442_b7633bd95b9e.Mount("Photos",
"ro,iocharset=iso8859-1")
will request the mounting of the device at /media/Photos. It will be mounted
read-only and with the specified character encoding."
from : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/2005-December/004077.html
there are even the shell scripts that will be probably (if not
already) included in hal
> (1) pmount <- *nice*
> (2) gnome-mount <- *meh*
ehehe i agree
_______________________________________________
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
