Matt McClinch wrote: >>>Whats wrong with smbfs? > > 1) It's not enabled by default in all systems, and > 2) The shares need to be mounted in the first place, and Thunar doesn't > provide a way to see what shares are available in order to mount them.
There are plans for a network browser for Thunar that will do this. >>My bad, I even don't use shared folders. I thought about a design where >>the views could be used to show something different than the folders. > > I like this suggestion. Are there any plans for making the VFS more > extendible? That way other people (not necessarily Benny) could add > support for smb://, ftp://, tar:/, etc. at the VFS level, possibly > through plugins. a) D-VFS will support this b) In the meantime, we can/will add a network browser (most probably based on avahi or howl, and using some SMB magic) to Thunar, that displays the available share and allows to mount them. > Matt Benedikt _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
