Hello, > > 2) how about integrating something like "gnome-volume-manager" for > > device automount? (of course, not gnome-dependant, as the next one > > too) > > > What that makes Thunar so great is that it's a desktop independent > filebrowser. > And i also beleve that the future of Thunar is being a desktop > independent application. > I really dont feel seeing Thunar as a yet another Gnome bloated > filemananger. > We already have Konqueror and Nautilus, please dont include this. > > and last but not least,
Sorry, but i don't see why you take the idea apart just cause it mentions some gnome app. It could use some plain X app for that as well, oder something designed for xfce itself. > > > > 3) are there any plans for adding something like the "connect to > > server" feature in Nautilus? (i think it's "gnome-vfs" the one who > > does it). > > > Please, no more Gnome libs. > Who says it must be gnome libs? Still, there may be a few people around who like typing an 80 char line for scp every time they aiming copy a few files to a remote location... i'm not one of those. I agree gnome-vfs is bad, as far as i have seen it's not something a filemanager like thunar should build upon. But that doesn't stop anyone from getting this included in thunar otherwise, does it? I think it would be really nice if thunar could handle scp,sftp,ftp and maybe webdav, guess would make life a step more easier. Regards Martin Hauser -- Martin Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG-Encrypted mail preferred, KEY: 0D459A72
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
