Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
>>> You're the boss, boss. But I'd argue that it ought to be there,
>>> because not having it creates the aforementioned problem with the file
>>> selector, and is inconsistent. Sure, it's Gtk pressing out hand on the
>>> issue, and Firefox makes it worse by defaulting to saving downloads
>>> there.
>>>
>>> It's consistent, and it cuts down on wasted bookmark space in the file
>>> selector, where the space really matters. I felt Gtk+ should never
>>> have included it in the first place, but there you go.
>>>
>>> If you still disagree, I'm done making my case ;-)
>> FWLIW, I agree with Erik. I'm fine with it either way, though, so maybe
>> I should have kept quite ... oops, too late ;)
>
> Something like this?
>
Very nice, indeed. Much better ;-)
Jasper
_______________________________________________
Thunar-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
