Hello Benedikt. Benedikt Meurer, 31.12.2006 15:37: > Mathias Brodala wrote: >>> Right now Thunar scales down >>> the 640x480 preview, which is not the optimal result for a webpage (IMHO). >> Well, then you could let the scaling be done via ImageMagick. This way you >> could >> optimize the thumbnail a bit (sharpening, …). Everything could go into a >> shell >> script and be used as the thumbnailer’s wrapper. > > The scaling is not the problem. Thunar does that very good and very > fast.
Good to know. Faster than calling convert/mogrify? > The real problem is that thumbnailing a webpage at 640x480 does > not yield good results for many webpages. Some may require more space, > some less. OK, now I understand. I think you can go with 800×600 as thumbnails size. The more the slower, I guess. > Therefore some magic may be required to detect this. If only Opera had an interface for this. (It’s „Fit to width“ feature is perfect for this.) Regards, Mathias -- debian/rules
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
