On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:02:28PM +0000, Erlend Davidson wrote: > There is a postscript thumnailer in there too now. This is a tad slow > (worst is 3 seconds per file), and I don't see that being a fixable > problem - it's just the way postscript is stored. I was thinking about a > couple of things in relation to this. It might be an idea to give > thumbnailers a priority in the .desktop files - keep the slowest ones > until last, and to give a way out if there is ever a conflict between > two thumbnailers wanting to do the same mimetype (i.e. choose the > fastest one which has all of TryExec satisfied)?
What about using the directory /dev/shm (if it exists) to do the compilation? For the record, it is a filesystem in RAM which is noticeably faster than hard-disk access. Regards, Mike -- http://massonnet.org/ Mike (m8t) Massonnet __oo GnuPG 0--" 0xF8C80F97 ---(_)_"> C4DA 431D 52F9 F930 3E5B 3E3D 546C 89D9 F8C8 0F97
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
