Jean-Francois Wauthy wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:42:58 +0300, Gregory Bonik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> > Hi > > >> Does Xfce try to be "closed", i.e. to keep a limited number of >> applications for it? Or is the appearance of such tutorial just a >> question of time? I think that appearance of different apps written >> specially for Xfce should bring more popularity and usability to it, so >> it's no reason to keep Xfce closed. Especially now, when Xfce becomes a >> _real_ desktop environment with own file manager etc. >> >> > > Xfce is not "closed", the problem is that our man power is limited and > therefore some cool things might be missing since we concentrate our > efforts on other parts. As Bennedikt already told you GTK+ is the base library > of Xfce, i guess the Internet has plenty of docs and tutorial about it; once > you know what you're doing with gtk i think having a look at the API > documentation to see what it offers above gtk is a good move. libexo has some > interesting stuff too that might be worth a look before starting writing a > xfce4-games application. > > And to finish Xfce is not so closed you know, i ended up with a CVS access 2 > months after installing it :D > > Of course I know that its base is GTK+, I already have experience of writing GTK programs, that's why I decided to write something for Xfce. I just wanted to ask if there are some look-n-feel standards etc. for "Xfce application".
Please excuse me for confusing a mailing list. I really looked like an idiot :-) _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
