Hello Benedikt.
Benedikt Meurer, 29.01.2007 11:24:
> Benedikt Meurer wrote:
>> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>>>>>> $ cat /proc/mounts | grep flashdisk
>>>>>> /dev/flashdisk /media/flashdisk vfat
>>>>>> rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,uid=1000,gid=1000,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=cp437,iocharset=iso8859-1
>>>>>> 0 0
>>>>> (But not as /dev/sda, of course.)
>>>> That's the problem: /dev/flashdisk and /dev/sda do not identify the same
>>>> device (i.e. one is a char device and the other's a block device, or the
>>>> rdev numbers do not match) and the device file paths are different. So
>>>> how should the software know that it's mounted?
>>>>
>>>> Just to be sure; post the output of ls -ld /dev/{sda,flashdisk}
>>> But I alread told you[0] that /dev/flashdisk is just a symlink to /dev/sda
>>> provided by one of my custom udev rules. So it IS the same device, only
>>> known
>>> under an unstable (read: changes depending on the order I plug the devices
>>> in)
>>> and a more meaningful and stable identifier.
>> Well, if it's a symlink, then exo-mount-point should be able to locate
>> that... weird... post the output of ls -ld /dev/{sda,flashdisk}.
>
> And just to be sure: You are using Thunar 1.0 and exo 0.3.2 now?No, not yet. (Since when exists version 1.0 of Thunar? Wasn’t version 0.8 released just recently?) Thunar is running as 0.5.0rc2 and libexo as 0.3.1.12rc2. If Thunar only needs to access libexo files via file system (and does not need them to be loaded in memory or something like that), then I can try building both from SVN once again and check if the error appears there. I’ll look if I can do this today. Regards, Mathias -- debian/rules
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
