Erlend Davidson wrote: >>> I have updated thunar-thumbnailers >>> (http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/thunar-plugins/thunar-thumbnailers) in >>> svn. I've added grace project file thumbnailing. It now installs >>> mimetypes for digital camera raw files, and for .agr grace project files. >>> >>> Everything works smoothly here, but could people please test it? If >>> there are no objections I'll make a release. >>> >> Looks good. Just one minor thingy: How about installing only a single >> mime definition file thunar-thumbnailers.xml unconditionally? > Originally that's what I thought: it would definitely make maintenance > easier in the long run. But then should I be installing a mimetype for > files when I'm not thumbnailing that type of file?
Having additional mime types doesn't hurt. Restricting to the mime types you install thumbnailers for looks wrong to me. > Is there a page in the documentation explaining what formats thunar can > thumbnail by default (i.e. without thunar-thumbnailers) and what their > dependencies are? Users won't realise they need totem for video > thumbnails to work. It would also help me think of thumbnailers to > implement in thunar-thumbnailers. > > There's quite a nice video thumbnailer using mplayer, which I hope to > include: > http://me2030581.googlepages.com/ Basically all supported GNOME thumbnailers. I doubt that there's a complete list of these. Nevertheless installing a video thumbnailer won't hurt. Thunar will use that instead of the GNOME fallback. > Erlend Benedikt _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
