Ben Ford wrote: > Stephan Arts wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Chris Shenton wrote: >>> > ... >>> Actually it's a problem with the thumbnail/.cache/NFS interaction. >>> I'm fine with symlinking ~/.cache (the NFS home) to >>> /usr/local/home/user/.cache/ (a machine-dependend local home, also for >>> .config and .gconf in my case), for example. >>> >> This sounds logical, thunar creates (and loads) thumbnails for every >> file it can. This results in some very massive network traffic when >> viewing a folder. >> >> You could argue that reading and writing thumbnails should be less >> intrusive, but I wouldn't really know how. >> >> @Benny, do you have an idea if this is possible? >> > > Why not cache remote filesystems to /tmp/thunar/...?
The other way round was needed. If the "destination" is remote, cache should be stored locally. It's no problem to index/analyse remote files, but it's a problem to store the result also remotely. Btw, you do already have the possibility to decide if remote files are thumbnailed. It's configurable via standard UI in Thunar. Best regards, -Harry _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
