Dennis Heuer wrote: > hello > > i love thunar and see no option to it. that's why i'm in the need to > convince you that the current way is half-baked. > > thunar even works with the old xsm - allowing for even slimmer systems. > this is rare today and great. however, generally, multiple thunar > instances are remembered correctly, it seems. though i found that at > about four instances the latter windows aren't correctly positioned (on > workspaces). however, may be of other reasons. the problem is not the > positioning but that all instances share the same configuration. the > thunar instance configured to look like a spatial view to show only > some starters looks the same like the fully configured thunar for > administrative tasks after a fresh login. this includes sorting, zoom, > etc. > > i please you to save the full state of an instance because otherwise > thunar can't be used to stay open in parallel on multiple workspaces. > > many thanks, > dennis heuer > I don't think the intention was for it to be 'half-baked'. I think the developers just didn't forsee that type of usage pattern.
I feel it was rather rude to come barging in here exlaiming this magnificent peice of software was 'half-baked.' I feel that for general users it was very well thought out. I think that you would have a more positive response if you would have used the bug tracker, and submitted this as a bug. Not claiming the software is half-baked and useless. Long time happy Thunar user, - Cory Christison _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
