On 2009-06-21 22:03, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:42:17 +0200
"Kurt J. Bosch"<[email protected]> wrote:
Thunar seems to use gnome-mount now. Is that intended ?
I know that exo-mount is not very good in respecting HAL policy,
locale and such. But do we need to pull in all the gconf stuff for
this ? I use a symlinked wrapper script here for all that which calls
pmount-hal, pumount and eject. And pmount-hal seems to do a quite
good job.
That's the reason why I want us to ship our own HAL or DeviceKit-disks
volume monitor backend for GIO. My Thunar branch currently relies on
GVfs for volume management and its HAL volume monitor has gnome-mount
hard-coded. Nice, eh?
<kidding> So why they don't depend on nautilus ? </kidding>
_______________________________________________
Thunar-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
