On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:48:49 +0200 Jannis Pohlmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:42:18 +0200 > Nick Schermer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I wonder what you guys think about this feature though. It's not > > > committed to master yet, because I'd like to get some feedback. Do > > > you like it, do you not like it? > > > > I would personally implement this in list model, so it scrolls > > nicely. > > Yeah. I did that first but it looked like crap (which I guess is > solvable). It also introduces new problems like how and when to resize > and where to scroll when raising the dialog (when a progress view > needs attention). > > I guess resizing could be rather simple by putting a scrolled window > around the views as soon as there are more than three of them. After > that, no forther resizing. Once there are less than four views, we > shrink/grow the window with each view. Something like that. I'll test > it later. Ok, a version with this implemened is now available in the 'shared-progress-dialog' branch. Please give it a try. Can anyone please run Thunar 1.0.x and check if their X CPU usage goes up to ~50% with ThunarVFS? It might be that my GIO job implementations emit more 'percent's signals and thus, causes a higher CPU usage. > > Another (big, but difficult) improvement would be a pause button > > and/or maybe a way (checkbox) to make 1 transfter at a time, this > > would speedup multiple copies to a usb device for example, but maybe > > that is a bit overly complicated. > > Yeah, although I'd say that this is a different story and can be > looked at independently. > > > Anyway, sound like a branch to me ;-). I created a branch now. Please give it a spin. - Jannis
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
