Roger,
Just for the curiosity sake:
Do you imply that the 10 ms time accuracy (available today with NTP) is not
sufficient for
the financial market and/or cash registers?
Regards,
Sasha
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Sundman
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 9:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [TICTOC] TICTOC Digest, Vol 25, Issue 2
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Requirements draft - call for assistance (Roger Sundman)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi all,
>
> There is a need for traceable time in the financial market
> and there is a (coming?) directive from the EC comission for traceable time
> for use in cash registers. Seismic exploration, military and transportation
> ar some other applications.
>
> Best regards
> Roger
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday the chairs and Silvana, who is co-editor of the requirements
> draft,
> discussed the progress of this draft.
>
> The requirements draft tries to cover quite a number of areas
> for which
> timing is relevant,
> and while there has been significant participation from the
> cellular and TDM
> PW communities,
> there has been inadequate input on most of the other areas.
>
> In particular, for the areas
> * industrial applications
> * test and measurement
> * electric power and teleprotection
> we have no data other than that "pulled out of the air" at the Paris
> meeting,
> and no one has expressed interest in providing insights into their
> requirements.
>
> On the one hand TICTOC needs to consider all of the
> applications that will
> need to distribute timing,
> but on the other hand if groups with interest in particular
> applications do
> not join in the effort,
> we will not be able to produce a meaningful document.
>
> Please consider this email as a call for participation for the
> aforementioned areas.
> If you are working or interested in them, please send an
> email to the list.
> If you know people who are, please forward this email to them.
>
> If we do not receive input that we believe reliably reflects the
> requirements of these areas,
> we will have to drop them from the document, and thus remove them from
> consideration
> while working on solutions.
>
> Y(J)S
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tictoc/attachments/20080918/24d9
7376/attachmen
t.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
End of TICTOC Digest, Vol 25, Issue 2
*************************************
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
