Danny,
Thanks for pointing out a good read. It's good to see published some of what's happened in private. With regards to feeedback (IIR) versus feedforward (FIR) algorithms. Using FIR turns the problem into a discrete time offset prediction problem which the control system folks know a lot about. It also makes it much easier to compare measurements because the common timebase is not moving around. The only thing I disagree with in his paper is that he hasn't gone far enough in the direction he's headed. Regards, Stuart ps. He seems to have an exceptionally good local oscillator for a PC. >>You may be interested in this article written by a couple of chaps in >>Australia, just published by the ACM. >>http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1773943 >>There's also a PDF of it: >>http://portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=1773943&type=pdf >>I don't know if any of this will be helpful for tictoc but it's worth >>sending out and their RADclock looks interesting. >>Danny _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
