Shaharm, > SD> I know Ron had a nice draft, but the issue with that draft is that it > required Deep packet inspection at line rate for all packets. Also it > requires use of CW. > Thanks for the compliment, but you probably read someone's else draft. Here it is http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ronc-ptp-mpls-00
The draft defines a PTP PW FEC (see section 6), hence it doesn't require any inspection. CW is not used (see figure 5). It does specify a direct PTP over MPLS mapping, without the additional use of Ethernet or IP encapsulation. Best, Ron
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
