Hi Shahram,
Some comments for the draft:
1. In section 8 it is recommended not to use Facility Backup FRR and I
wonder why can't we use the 'PTP labels' also for the bypass tunnel in
this case?
2. I would suggest adding some text to help clarify the interoperability
with Explicit Null labels.
3. I would suggest adding some text to help clarify the interoperability
with Implicit Null label.
4. Can't we use the existing Router Alert label in some deployments
where the 2-step clock is used (assuming PTP traffic is relatively low)?
5. Some editorial issues I noticed:
a. Line#35: Remove completely or update ("This Internet-Draft will
expire on January 15, 2009.")
b. Line#60: Remove duplication ("over an MPLS network to enable to
enable a proper handling of these")
c. Line#283: Remove duplication ("Range MAY be be global, meaning that
all nodes and links in an MPLS")
Regards,
Moti Nisim
________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Yaakov Stein
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 09:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TICTOC] draft-davari-tictoc-1588-over-mpls-00.txt
Hi all
Shahram asked me to send this draft on 1588oMPLS to the list.
Y(J)S
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
