Xie, Is there a reason why you cant use the Security mechanism described in Annex K of IEEE std 1588-2008?
Jack On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Xie Lei <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Jack > > Thanks for your information, i had discussed with RFC5840 authors in IETF > 79# meeting. It is possible to use RFC5840 to fulfill this synchronization > requirements. I will follow the progress and provide more information to > Tictoc group. > > BR > > Rock > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jack Kohn > To: [email protected] ; [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 12:30 PM > Subject: RE: The draft for IPsec synchronization security > Xie: > > While i understand your motivation to secure the timing packets, you > really dont need the extensions that you have defined in the below > draft. You must look at RFC 5840 that extends ESP and see how that can > be used for achieving the same functionality as you desire. > > Jack > >> Hi Yaakov and all >> Huawei has submitted one draft for IPSec synchronization security, you can >> find it in following link >> >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-xu-tictoc-ipsec-security-for-synchronization-00.txt >> >> We also attach one discussion document in this email, i hope we can >> present it in IETF Beijing meeting. >> >> BR >> Rock _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
