Hi Tal, In addition to what Shahram has said:
> 6. 1588 Message Transport > "If Two Step Transparent clocks are present, then the > FOLLOW_UP and DELAY_RESP messages must also be transported > over the PTP LSPs." > - for P2P TCs you also need the PDelay_Resp_Follow_Up. > > SD> AFAIK These messages don't require time stamping and > therefore don't have to be transported over PTP LSP. The PDelay_Resp_Follow_Up message will never go through a TC and will never have its CF modified. In the case of a non-TC PTP LSR, it is only the PDelay_Req and PDelay-Resp message that are time sensitive. So the PDelay_Resp_Follow_Up can be sent outside of the PTP LSP. > > 10. QoS Considerations > - I am not sure I understand why this is a MUST. This draft > defines an encapsulation, while the QoS requirements are > typically be derived from the application, which is defined elsewhere. > > SD> The application is PTP, which requires low delay. Are you > suggesting we make it a should? The current text does not use a MUST. Does that look ok? Cheers, Manav _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
