Marshall > I think you are referring to this > which is (will be shortly) in 6man > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eubanks-chimento-6man-01 > > This is for the case where there is an "inner" packet with a header and > checksum, > so that the "outer" packet doesn't need protection.
Actually, I think Stewart was referring to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-13 . If there are several proposals on the table, albeit for special cases, to make the UDP checksum optional, then we can propose that operation too. Y(J)S _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
