Well, you need to signal protocol type as well as offset which complicates the P nodes because of the different formats, whereas if you just have the correction field immediately after the BoS followed by the opaque payload, the P nodes can use a canonical time format and the correction can be applied in the PEs.

Stewart

On 01/02/2011 19:37, Shahram Davari wrote:
Hi Stewart,

I think with our mechanism you can support NTP as well. NTP does not need TC 
processing and only needs Transmit and Receive timestamps, which are local to 
the LSP ingress and Egress nodes. The UDP port number for NTP is different from 
PTP and therefore no TC processing will be applied to NTP packets.

So our mechanism could be generalized to NTP a well. The co-routed symmetry is 
needed for both NTP and PTP. The PTP label is needed for the LSP egress node 
(for both NTP and PTP) to sample the timestamp.

Thx
Shahram

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Stewart Bryant
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Transporting PTP messages (1588) over MPLS Networks

On 01/02/2011 15:52, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
Hi Yakov,

And I still stand by what I said earlier that I don't think NTP needs to be 
included here. I'd rather that we keep NTP and 1588 separate and only merge 
them if we think its absolutely essential that a common uniform solution is 
developed for the two protocols.
Manav

It is the normal practice of the IETF to design a single common
mechanism for a problem, so you need to justify why we need to develop a
special purpose protocol rather than develop for instance a time
correction protocol.

It would be better in my view to design a correction mechanism that sits
as preamble to an opaque payload and then fix up the timing packet in
the Timing equivalent of a PW NSP. That would work for any protocol that
needed time of flight correction.

Stewart
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc





--
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html


_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc

Reply via email to