I agree the errata is correct. Dave Hart
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 17:06, David L. Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > Danny and the WG, > > Agreed; that is correct.. > > Dave > > Danny Mayer wrote: > >> Errata for RFC 5905. Section 7.4 b. needs to be fixed. The word >> reduce ("reduce its polling interval") should be increase ("increase the >> polling interval"). >> >> The full sentence is as follows: >> >> b. For kiss code RATE, the client MUST immediately reduce its >> polling interval to that server and continue to reduce it each >> time it receives a RATE kiss code. >> >> This should read: >> >> b. For kiss code RATE, the client MUST immediately increase its >> polling interval to that server and continue to increase it each >> time it receives a RATE kiss code. >> >> The server is saying that you should ask for packets less often and not >> more often. >> >> Danny >> _______________________________________________ >> ntpwg mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg >> > > _______________________________________________ > TICTOC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc > _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
