On Dec 26, 2011, at 12:13 AM, Danny Mayer wrote: Is there a reason that RFC5908 - "Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6" is not sufficient for this? Why do we need yet another way of specifying NTP servers? I'm copying the DHC working group on this though I think some of them are also on the 6man WG mailing list as well.
It's actually a really bad idea to have two ways of configuring the same information. The choice to provide DNS server information via RA was a mistake that is now creating unnecessary complexity in stacks. This is not something that should be duplicated for additional RA options.
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
