Hi Doug, thanks for your draft .
There are a few points that I think would need some clarification. 1) As also mentioned at last tictoc meeting, there is a risk of multiplication of profiles. It is not fully clear in the Introduction what is so specific to enterprise networks to requiring the definition of a specific profile. 2) the proposed profile would support a combinations of various options (e.g. various modes defined in section 6) but the task of a profile should normally also be to minimize the number of IEEE1588 options. Are all these options really required ? 3) section 4 indicates a target requirement of 1 us : is there a reference for that? 4) It should be noted that the performance (e.g. 1 us) can not be guaranteed by a profile as such. Other aspects, such as network reference model, clock characteristics, also have to be defined in order to provide some guarantee on the achievable performance. How are these planned to be addressed? Will it make reference to ITU-T recommendations? 5) Concerning the "Hybrid" and "Unicast" mode in section 6.3 (see also remark from Laurent on the confusing terminology used), in case of "partial support" , the potential risk of adiditonal asymmetries should be mentioned (see also Appendix I in G.8265.1) . This is not an issue in case of frequency sync but it is in case of time sync. Best Regards Stefano ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Doug Arnold Sent: lunedì 25 febbraio 2013 22.52 To: [email protected] Subject: [TICTOC] PTP Enterprise Profile draft Here is a first cut at a draft of a PTP profile foe enterprise networks. Any feedback/suggestions would be much appreciated. I enclose both a MS Word version and a pure text version, since I used the Joe Touch's template. //Doug
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
