I submitted comments on v03 11 January ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/current/msg01331.html). Vinay indicated in a short message on 23 January the comments would be addressed in the next version ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/current/msg01333.html). v04 was published 31 January. I did not see any notes from the authors associated with that revision. A quick check of the v03-v04 diff shows evidence that not all my comments were directly addressed. Can I get a summary of how my comments were addressed? I'm fine if some of these were rejected but I would like to verify that they were given consideration.
Kevin Gross +1-303-447-0517 Media Network Consultant AVA Networks - www.AVAnw.com <http://www.avanw.com/>, www.X192.org On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]>wrote: > This message initiates a two week TICTOC Working Group Last Call on > advancing: > > Title : Precision Time Protocol Version 2 (PTPv2) Management Information > Base > Author(s) : Vinay Shankarkumar, Laurent Montini, Tim Frost, Greg Dowd > Filename : draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-05.**txt > Pages : 77 > Date : 2013-02-25 > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/**doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib/** > ?include_text=1<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib/?include_text=1> > > as a Standards Track RFC. Substantive comments and statements of support > for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. > Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last call > will end on 31 May 2013. > > ______________________________**_________________ > TICTOC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/tictoc<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc> >
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
