On 6/30/2015 8:33 AM, Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL) wrote: > I support this draft, But how about more Bit incorporating in field type, Tal > let me know your view. >
No. We've already been over this ad nauseum and it makes no sense. Danny > Thanks & Regards > Anil S N > > "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" - Jon > Postel > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ntpwg [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Karen O'Donoghue >> Sent: 30 June 2015 17:59 >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: [ntpwg] WGLC on draft-mizrahi-ntp-checksum-trailer-02.txt >> >> Folks, >> >> This begins a two week working group last call (WGLC) on draft-mizrahi- >> ntp-checksum-trailer-02.txt >> Using UDP Checksum Trailers in the Network Time Protocol (NTP) >> >> This document has been proposed as an experimental RFC and has been >> available for quite some time. >> >> Please respond by 15 July 2015 to the mailing list with any comments or >> objections to the draft. >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mizrahi-ntp-checksum-trailer >> >> Thanks! >> Karen >> _______________________________________________ >> ntpwg mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg > _______________________________________________ > ntpwg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg > > _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
