Hello Hal, thanks for the suggestion. I’m going to check this. Dieter
> Am 24.03.2016 um 11:45 schrieb Hal Murray <[email protected]>: > > > [email protected] said: >> Yes, this is true. But the capabilities of NTP to keep track of the states >> are very limited. Our NTP servers with the most current NTPD are only able >> to store about 12000 records, in which the oldest records are about 10 to >> 60 seconds old. They even cannot guarantee to memorize the state of a >> client when it is in iburst mode. Perhaps the implementation can be >> adjusted to allow for even more state information. ... > > Please check the mru configuration option. It's in html/miscopt.html > > Ignoring NTS, I'd like to know if you run out of memory before you can keep > track of all your clients. > > I'm not trying to fight stateless approaches, but I'm not sure we should > discard a suggestion because it requires state. > > Let's play with the back of an envelope. Suppose we allocate a gigabyte for > holding state and each client needs 1000 bytes. That's a million clients. > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
