[email protected] said: > We have to be careful here. I agree that at least some cipher suites should > be specified as a minimal subset in the draft but we also need flexibility > as new ciphers come out and older ones are found to be vunerable. Otherwise > we will need to create new RFC's to update the RFC for either of these > scenarios. I'm sure that there are other implementations that have run into > this problem and we should see how they handle it.
Is there any group in the IETF keeping track of which cyphers are good/weak? It would be nice if there were something like the assigned numbers role, but this is more complicated that just assigning and keeping track of what has been assigned. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
