[email protected] said: > I am in full agreement with those who feel that the apriori assumptions of > NTS initialization (e.g., impact of unknown time on cert validation/ > revocation, requirement to gate time step until "proventic" bit set) should > be an output of the NTS design process. Whether it is in the same document, > or a bcp, or whatever, I have no useful info to add.
I think we should have 2 documents. NTS should state what assumptions it is making about getting started. I think that is that the system has some top-level certificates and that they are valid. We need another BCP type document to discuss all the techniques, heuristics, and issues of getting started when you don't know the time. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
