Working Group, I seem not to be able to get this working group last call started correctly :(
- first, I sent the mail without a copy to wg group - second, I say in the text that "the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other IPRs [than what have been disclosed] that relates to this draft." This is not correct, ALL authors and contributors has responded to the IPR poll. Sorry for fumbling in this way!! /Loa On 2016-05-31 18:27, Loa Andersson wrote:
Working Group, This is to initiate a two week working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-09. Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list ([email protected]). There were one IPR disclosure against the individual draft that this document replaced. The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked about the working group discussions related to any IPR disclosures. We like to remind the working group that discussion on the content and validity of an IPR disclosure should not take place on the MPLS wg list or any IETF mailing lists. However we are looking for simple statements whether you think the working group should continue progress the document, regardless of an existing IPR disclosure. Please include this information in your "support/do not support" when responding to working group adoption calls and last calls. All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other IPRs that relates to this draft. This working group last call ends June 15, 2016. CCAMP and TICTOC wg's, This is to inform you that this wglc is taking place, please direct the discussion to the mpls wg mailing list. /Loa for the MPLS wg chairs
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
