Tal, Good suggestions! Based on your comments, I would propose the following texts for the Security considerations: “YANG modules are designed to be accessed via the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241], thus security considerations in [RFC6241] apply here. Security measures such as using the NETCONF over SSH [RFC6242] and restricting its use with access control [RFC6536] can further improve its security, avoid injection attacks and misuse of the protocol. Furthermore, general security considerations of time protocols are discussed in [RFC7384].
Some data nodes defined in this YANG module are writable, and an inappropriate use of them may adversely impact a synchronization network, for example, loss of synchronization on a clock, accuracy degradation on a set of clocks, or even break down of a whole synchronization network.” Are you OK with the above texts? Thanks a lot, Yuanlong From: ntp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tal Mizrahi Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 2:59 PM To: Karen O'Donoghue Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ntp] [TICTOC] WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang Hi, I believe this draft is almost ready to proceed to the IESG. Other than the YANG format issues that have already mentioned on the list, I believe the Security Considerations section should be slightly extended. - "Some data nodes defined in this YANG module are writable, and any changes to them may adversely impact a synchronization network." Please elaborate about the consequences, i.e., what is the impact on the network (Clock inaccuracy? Loss of synchronization? Other consequences?). - The section should probably mention that the security considerations of time protocols in general are discussed in [RFC 7384]. Cheers, Tal. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Folks, This message begins a 2 week working group last call (WGLC) for the following document: YANG Data Model for IEEE 1588v2 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang/ Please review the referenced document and send any comments to the mailing list including your assessment of whether this document is mature enough to proceed to the IESG. Please note that these messages of support for progression to the mailing list are important and will be used to determine WG consensus to proceed. Please send all comments in by Thursday 28 September 2017. Thank you! Karen _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
