Hi,
Regarding the YANG model defined in draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07: When an arbitrary identifier is needed for a list key, most YANG models tend to use strings (e.g. ietf-hardware, ietf-interfaces, tend to use strings rather than numbers. I suggest changing instance-number to a string instance-name. Is there a way for the management system to determine the relationship between port numbers and interface names, when using transparent clock mode? port-ds-list has underlying-interface, which seems to solve exactly this problem. But there's no such leaf for transparent-clock-port-ds-list. Finally, what should happen if a port is configured as a member of more than one instance (or one instance and transparent clock)? Thanks, Alex
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
