My understanding of the Enterprise profile is that the logMessageInterval field 
is simply ignored in favor of a profile-specified value. The profile is 
designed to live alongside non-Enterprise nodes on the same PTP network. All 
other profiles are going to put 0x7F in the logMessageInterval field on a 
unicast reply, so the field can't be used for auto-discovery of parameters with 
any profile. I think using 0x7F was a bad idea in the first place, but it's a 
very clear requirement in 1588-2008. I can't think of any good reason to remove 
useful information simply because a message was unicast instead of multicast. 
There's already a flag for that in the header. Best regards, Jeffry ---- On 
Mon, 16 Jul 2018 05:15:31 -0500 Wojciech Owczarek <[email protected]> 
wrote ---- All, I might have asked this question before and I think I know the 
answer, but just to re-state this: This being an IEEE 1588 profile, a 
recommendation to set logMessagePeriod in the enterprise profile delay response 
header to be the configured master delayReq period, rather than the 0x7F as per 
the standard for any unicast message, is out of the question? This would allow 
the delay message interval to be autodiscovered like it is with multicast 
delayReq/resp. I have seen this done in the field, just like some slave 
implementations will try unicast delayReq first, and use multicast if no 
response received. 0x7F makes sense as an indication that the interval should 
be negotiated, but not where unicast is used without negotiation. This only 
adds an extra variable to the otherwise automatic slave configuration. I have 
not been keeping up with the protocol revision work, but does anyone know if 
P1588 was able to tackle this? Regards, Wojciech -- Wojciech Owczarek   
Original Message   From: [email protected] Sent: 16 July 2018 9:12 am 
To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [TICTOC] [Ntp] WGLC 
draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile Neither do I, thanks a lot, Tal!   BR  
 Heiko     --  Heiko Gerstung  Managing Director MEINBERG® Funkuhren GmbH & Co. 
KG Lange Wand 9 D-31812 Bad Pyrmont, Germany Phone:    +49 (0)5281 9309-404 
Fax:        +49 (0)5281 9309-9404 Amtsgericht Hannover 17HRA 100322 
Geschäftsführer/Management: Günter Meinberg, Werner Meinberg, Andre Hartmann, 
Heiko Gerstung   On 04.07.18, 23:34  "TICTOC im Auftrag von Douglas Arnold" 
<[email protected] im Auftrag von [email protected]> wrote:   
I have no objections to Tal's suggestions.     --- Doug   On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 
at 3:27 AM, Tal Mizrahi <[email protected]> wrote: Hi,    I believe 
this draft is almost ready for publication, with a couple of comments below.   
A couple of comments: - The section "Forbidden PTP Options" should include also 
unicast discovery and unicast negotiation (mentioned in previous sections). - 
In the "Security Considerations" section - I suggest to add a general comment: 
"General security considerations of time protocols are discussed in [RFC7384]". 
  Thanks, Tal.   On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 6:35 AM, Karen O'Donoghue 
<[email protected]> wrote: Folks,   This email begins a quick followup WGLC 
for the following draft: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile/   
This document has been around for a long time, and it has been aligned with the 
updates planned to IEEE 1588. Please respond on the mailing list with your 
recommendation on publication of this document along with any final comments 
that you may have. This WGLC will close on Wednesday 11 July 2018.    Regards, 
Karen     _______________________________________________ ntp mailing list 
[email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp   
_______________________________________________ ntp mailing list [email protected] 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp   -- Doug Arnold Principal 
Technologist Meinberg USA +1-508-309-6268   
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list 
[email protected] https://www.ietf..org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc 
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list 
[email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc

Reply via email to