> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The model was not reviewed by YANG doctors, at least there is no record of > such > review. It should be, especially given the subject area of the model is not a > native IETF technology. > Review requests for the WG Last Call draft (that is, draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-5) and the resolution draft (draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-6) had been sent to NETMOD, TICTOC and IEEE 1588 WG for their reviews, and we received quite a lot of valuable comments from participants in these work groups.
YANG Doctor review was assigned to Mehmet by Benoit in this email as I am aware: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg18893.html But indeed we haven't received any comments from Mehmet until now. BTW, draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-05 model has been integrated into the ONF's CENTENNIAL project (ONF wireless transport): https://github.com/OpenNetworkingFoundation/CENTENNIAL/tree/master/models/yang According to the ONF news, multiple vendors took part in the PTP synchronization use case (seems mainly based on this draft) and successfully demonstrated its interoperability. Please see more the details in the following link: https://www.opennetworking.org/news-and-events/blog/onfs-open-transport-working-group-completes-fourth-wireless-transport-poc/ Thanks, Yuanlong _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
