TidBITS#818/27-Feb-06
=====================

  Are the recent Mac OS X security vulnerabilities the work
  of genius crackers or mostly just shortcomings in Mac OS X's
  association of applications and documents? Geoff Duncan looks
  at the recent Safari exploit and Matt Neuburg explains how we've
  ended up in this situation. Also in this issue, Adam reviews
  iPhoto 6 in detail, checks in with the latest news from former
  Macintosh evangelist Guy Kawasaki, and looks briefly at Apple's
  announcement of the one-billionth song sold via iTunes.

Topics:
    MailBITS/27-Feb-06
    iTunes Music Store Tops 1 Billion Songs Sold
    Guy Kawasaki Is Back!
    Significant Safari Exploit Discovered
    Of Files, Forks, and FUD
    iPhoto 6: Good, but Not Ground-Breaking
    Take Control News/27-Feb-06
    Hot Topics in TidBITS Talk/27-Feb-06

<http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-818.html>
<ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/issues/2006/TidBITS#818_27-Feb-06.etx>

Copyright 2006 TidBITS: Reuse governed by Creative Commons license
   <http://www.tidbits.com/terms/> Contact: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

This issue of TidBITS sponsored in part by:
* READERS LIKE YOU! Support TidBITS with a contribution today! <----- NEW!
   <http://www.tidbits.com/about/support/contributors.html>
   Special thanks this week to Larry Asher, Irving Alan Sparks,
   Karen Lindner, and Holmes Boroughf for their kind support!

* Make friends and influence people by sponsoring TidBITS! <--------- NEW!
   Put your company and products in front of tens of thousands of
   savvy, committed Macintosh users who actually buy stuff.
   For more information and rates, email <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

* SMALL DOG ELECTRONICS: Used iPods On Sale!
   20 GB (4th gen) - $174; 20 GB (Color display) - $219
   2 GB nano - $169; 6 GB mini - $199; shuffle - $45
   Visit: <http://www.smalldog.com/> 800-511-MACS

* FETCH SOFTWORKS: Fetch 5 makes FTP and SFTP easy! <---------------- NEW!
   Upload, download, mirror, and manage your Web site. Dozens of
   new features to make file transfers easier and more reliable.
   Get your free trial version at <http://fetchsoftworks.com/>!

* Web Crossing, Inc: Web Crossing offers integrated collaboration
   tools with a broad spectrum of functionality, but did you know
   adding discussions, blogs, podcasts, chat, polls, and calendars
   is point-click easy? Try a demo! <http://www.webcrossing.com/>

* StuffIt Deluxe 10 from Allume Systems supports Automator,
   compresses JPEGs up to 30%, enables Spotlight to search in
   archives, can make self-extracting archives, and more!
   Upgrade for only $29.99! <http://www.stuffit.com/mac/deluxe/>

* Yojimbo 1.0 from Bare Bones Software: Your effortless, reliable <-- NEW!
   information organizer for Mac OS X. It will change your life,
   without changing the way you work. Download the demo or buy it
   today! <http://www.barebones.com/products/yojimbo/>

* AUDIO HIJACK PRO: Gain total audio control to record <------------- NEW!
   and enhance any audio. Save Internet streams, import
   vinyl & much more. MacUser's 2004 Utility of the Year!
   Download it now: <http://www.rogueamoeba.com/ad/tb/>

* Circus Ponies NoteBook: Never lose anything again. NoteBook <------ NEW!
   keeps your digital life organized. Take notes, clip content,
   share information. Find anything instantly with automatic
   index pages. Free 30-day demo! <http://www.circusponies.com/>

* THE TECH NIGHT OWL LIVE: Listen to the popular podcast and <------- NEW!
   online show featuring best-selling author and columnist
   Gene Steinberg, and hear the movers and shakers of
   the tech industry. Visit <http://www.techbroadcasting.com/>.
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

MailBITS/27-Feb-06
------------------

**Apple Special Event Coverage** -- This week's issue goes out a
  day before an Apple media event on 28-Feb-06, and although we
  could prognosticate until our keyboards break under the strain,
  we'll instead do the sensible thing and report on Steve Jobs's
  announcements in ExtraBITS shortly after they happen. [JLC]

<http://www.tidbits.com/extrabits/>


iTunes Music Store Tops 1 Billion Songs Sold
--------------------------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  Next time I visit Cupertino, I'll be looking to see if Apple
  has co-opted one of those McDonald's signs touting the number of
  burgers served to advertise the number of songs sold on the iTunes
  Music Store. If such a sign existed earlier this month, it would
  have had to add an extra digit on February 23rd, 2006, when the
  iTunes Music Store sold its one-billionth song (that's an American
  billion, not a British billion, though you probably would have
  assumed as much).

<http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2006/feb/23itms.html>
<http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutwords/billion>

  That one-billionth song was "Speed of Sound" from Coldplay's X&Y
  album, purchased by Alex Ostrovsky from West Bloomfield, Michigan.
  For clicking the Buy button in iTunes at just the right moment,
  Alex won a 20-inch iMac, 10 fifth-generation iPods, and a $10,000
  gift card to the iTunes Music Store (I have this great mental
  image of the guy being presented with an iTunes Music Store
  gift card the size of a sheet of plywood). Apple also established
  a scholarship in Alex's name to the Juilliard School of Music
  to commemorate the one-billionth sale.

  Apple's milestone press releases are doubly interesting because
  they usually contain additional information about the contents
  and sales of the iTunes Music Store at the time (Wikipedia appears
  to collect much of this information, though I'd be interested to
  see a graph of the sales as well). For instance, the iTunes Music
  Store has sold more than 15 million videos and currently contains
  roughly:

* 60 television shows
* 3,500 music videos and short films from Pixar and Disney
* 16,000 audiobooks
* 35,000 podcasts
* 2,000,000 songs

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITunes_Music_Store>


Guy Kawasaki Is Back!
---------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  As the Macintosh has matured over the years, some people moved on,
  and the Mac world was the poorer for it. But one familiar face
  from the days of yore has been popping up again lately: ex-Apple
  evangelist Guy Kawasaki. Guy is a managing director of the Garage
  Technology Ventures venture capital fund, and he was all over
  Macworld Expo in San Francisco showing off FilmLoop. It was great
  to see him back in the Macintosh community again, and thanks to
  the blog at the very end of 2005, I think he'll once again be
  something of a public figure.

<http://blog.guykawasaki.com/>

  In classic Guy fashion, this isn't Just Another Blog (its tagline
  is "Blogger. n. Someone with nothing to say writing for someone
  with nothing to do." Ouch). Instead, Guy's blog is filled with
  the kind of practical wisdom he's been dispensing in his books
  since the days of "The Macintosh Way." His more recent books have,
  needless to say, taken a bit more of the venture capitalist point
  of view (hence the titles: "The Art of the Start," "Rules for
  Revolutionaries," "Selling the Dream," and "How to Drive Your
  Competition Crazy.") but they're amusing, insightful, and useful
  for almost anyone starting a new project, giving a presentation,
  or trying to figure out how to stand out from the crowd. Guy's
  blog postings have exactly the same qualities, and the blog format
  may actually be a more effective presentation method for some
  of his ideas, since they come in small, periodic chunks. Much as
  I like Guy's books, I find that I read them, get all fired about
  implementing some of his ideas, find myself snowed under by some
  project, and never get around to doing what I'd planned. Perhaps
  the constant nudges from Guy's blog will actually cause me to
  think and act.

  (And if you're new to the Macintosh world and haven't the foggiest
  idea who Guy Kawasaki is, pick up a copy of "The Macintosh Way"
  and read it - used copies are about $5 on Amazon and the blog
  has links to all of his books.)

  One area in which Guy has long excelled is in community building.
  He was always a huge supporter of user groups within Apple, and
  in fact, I chatted with him in-between our talks at the User Group
  University (the attendees were all user group leaders) the day
  before Macworld Expo in San Francisco. I'd just finished speaking
  to the group - along with Chris Breen and Bob LeVitus - on how
  user groups can revitalize themselves and stay relevant in today's
  age, so it was particularly interesting to see Guy's recent post
  on community building. Excellent points, and the comments are also
  equally as worthwhile for anyone interested in user groups or just
  bringing people together. [ACE]

<http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2006/02/the_art_of_crea.html>


Significant Safari Exploit Discovered
-------------------------------------
  by Geoff Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  A potentially critical security flaw has been uncovered in
  Apple's Safari Web browser, which may enable attackers to
  execute arbitrary Unix shell scripts on a user's machine simply
  by following a link on a Web site. Apple has yet to comment
  or release a patch, but in the meantime, we'd urge Safari users
  to disable the "Open 'safe' files after downloading" option in
  General pane of Safari's preferences. (In fact, we've recommended
  disabling this option since May 2005, when a weakness involving
  Dashboard widgets was discovered).

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=08119>

  The root of the exploit involves the way Mac OS X determines
  which program should launch files of a particular type. Under
  Mac OS 9, applications were associated with files using four-
  letter creator codes stored in a file's resource fork; under
  Mac OS X, applications are associated with file via a more arcane
  system involving metadata and a file's extension. By renaming
  a Unix shell script to a "safe" extension (like .pdf, .jpg, etc.),
  setting the script file's executable bit, and compressing the
  script with the Zip archiving utility, Safari will happily
  download the script, decompress it, assume the script is "safe,"
  then blithely pass it off to the Mac OS X Terminal application
  for execution. An attacker could easily use such a script
  to delete a user's home directory, damage the computer's
  configuration, or obtain personal data. (For more information,
  see Matt Neuburg's "Of Files, Forks, and FUD" elsewhere in
  this issue.)

  Safari is the only Web browser known to be affected, although it
  is possible other programs could be vulnerable to similar attacks.
  The Camino and Firefox Web browsers are not vulnerable to this
  particular exploit.

  Danish security firm Secunia has listed the flaw as "extremely
  critical," and has posted a harmless sample exploit of the flaw
  so users can test if their systems are vulnerable. Heise Online
  has another demonstration of the exploit.

<http://secunia.com/advisories/18963>
<http://secunia.com/mac_os_x_command_execution_vulnerability_test/>
<http://www.heise.de/security/dienste/browsercheck/demos/safari/Heise.jpg.zip>

  Users may also be able to protect themselves from the exploit by
  removing the Terminal application from its default location in
  Applications > Utilities. (However, doing so may confuse future
  system updaters, so users would probably have to remember to put
  it back before installing new software.)

  By default, Safari's "Open 'safe' files after downloading" option
  is disabled on new Mac OS X 10.4.5 installations, so many users
  may be safe from this exploit by default. However, merely running
  Mac OS X 10.4.5 is no guarantee of safety: we've confirmed systems
  updated to Mac OS 10.4.5 from earlier versions may well leave
  Safari's "Open 'safe' files after downloading" option enabled.
  So, to be safe, check that the option is disabled on your system
  regardless of the version of Mac OS X you're using.


Of Files, Forks, and FUD
------------------------
  by Matt Neuburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  As a level-headed, rational reader of TidBITS, you have, I trust,
  resisted being swept away on the wave of fear, uncertainty, and
  doubt spread this past week with regard to the latest variety of
  Mac OS X security holes to gain wide attention (see Geoff Duncan's
  "Significant Safari Exploit Discovered," elsewhere in this
  issue, for more details). The mass media, not unexpectedly, have
  eliminated from their "reporting" all historical perspective and
  technical details in favor of block-busting headlines whose actual
  semantic content ("Mac OS X has viruses!") is on a par with an
  inarticulate scream. And then there are the usual fear-mongering
  press releases from self-interested companies. Let us, however,
  ignore the hype and consider the facts.


**Open Sesame** -- Those facts mostly involve how documents
  and applications are associated in Mac OS X. When you look
  at a document in the Finder, it has an icon supplied by the
  application that opens it. When you double-click the document,
  that application is launched and opens the document. How is
  this association maintained?

  Back in the days of Mac OS 9 and before, the answer involved
  metadata invisibly stored in the file system and looked up through
  an invisible database. When Mac OS X emerged, though, Apple set
  out to supersede this architecture with those obnoxious little
  file extensions that appear, visibly or otherwise, after a period
  in the name of the file, along with a complicated series of
  strategies for locating the associated application.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05415>
<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=06584>
<http://arstechnica.com/reviews/os/metadata.ars/8>

  Apple thus suppressed an elegant method of performing document-
  application associations, one that worked reliably (barring the
  occasional need to "rebuild the desktop" when the association
  broke down) and was invisible to the user, in favor of an ugly and
  often unpredictable system of incorporating a file's type into its
  name merely because that's how other operating systems do things.
  Except that they didn't completely suppress the earlier method;
  instead, they incorporated it into an uneasy Jekyll-and-Hyde
  alliance. For one thing, a file left over from the pre-Mac OS X
  days might well have no filename extension. So a file might have
  type/creator metadata, or a filename extension - or both.

  But there's more. Consider the problem of a generic file type,
  such as .pdf. Both Preview and Adobe Reader can open a .pdf,
  so which of them should open this particular .pdf file? You, the
  user, might answer that question on a one-time basis by dragging
  the file onto the desired application's icon in the Dock or
  the Finder. But what if you wanted to _assign_ the file to
  one application or the other, so that it would _always_ open
  with that application when double-clicked in the Finder?

  For reasons that aren't entirely clear to me, Mac OS X does
  not use the type/creator metadata to handle this situation.
  Instead, Apple instituted a slot in the resource fork - the 'usro'
  resource - where the user's custom file association is stored.
  Thus, when you use the Open With pop-up menu in the Finder's
  Get Info dialog, you're actually setting the file's 'usro'
  resource. It's possible for a file to end up with all three -
  a 'usro' resource and a metadata creator code and a filename
  extension.

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=07516>


**Exploring the Exploitation** -- The trouble, it turns out, is
  that it is possible to misuse these pieces of information to
  generate a conflict. Such a conflict lies at the heart of the
  current set of security exploits. When you download and expand
  the demonstration file created by Heise, what you end up with
  is a text file containing shell script commands; but the file
  has a .jpg extension and a bad 'usro' resource. The extension
  determines the document icon (on my machine, it is a JPEG icon
  that comes from Preview), but the 'usro' resource associates the
  file with a different application, namely the Terminal. You can
  tell that in fact this is a Terminal document by examining the
  file's Get Info dialog in the Finder.

<http://www.heise.de/security/dienste/browsercheck/demos/safari/Heise.jpg.zip>

  The fact that this inconsistency is possible is probably a bug in
  the system. Theoretically, the system ought to be able to detect
  that the 'usro' resource is invalid. When I test the user creator-
  assignment mechanism, I observe that the file, along with a 'usro'
  resource, gets an 'icns' resource which is labelled "Binding
  Override" and presumably is intended to be the document icon from
  the newly assigned creator. For example, GraphicConverter's JPEG
  icon is different from Preview's JPEG icon. But Terminal has no
  JPEG icon, because it doesn't open JPEG files; and besides, the
  exploit needs Terminal to treat the file as text, not as JPEG.
  So the Heise file has no 'icns' resource, and this should alert
  the system that something's wrong.


**Stuff and Nonsense** -- The fact that the exploit involves a
  .zip file, which is expanded on your computer in order to generate
  the invalid document, is irrelevant. True, the document is
  expanded by either StuffIt Expander or Apple's own application,
  BOMArchiveHelper; but these applications play no important part
  in the story, as they are merely reproducing, correctly, the bad
  file that was handed to them in the first place. It is also true
  that the .zip file, internally, is in a special format; but the
  same thing would apply to any file with a resource fork.

  The role of Safari in the story should also not be stressed
  unduly. It is true that if Safari's "Open 'safe' files after
  downloading" preference is turned on (which, for many reasons,
  it should not be), Safari will effectively open the downloaded
  file twice - once to unzip it, and once to open what it wrongly
  thinks is a nice safe .jpg file. But this is no different, really,
  from what _you_ would do with the file in the Finder by double-
  clicking the .zip file and then the .jpg file.

  It has also been observed that Apple's Mail suffers from the same
  behavior as the Finder - that is, when this file is sent to you
  as an email attachment, Mail shows you a JPEG icon (as well as the
  .jpg extension), but opens the file in the Terminal if you double-
  click it. However, I'm fairly sure that this is the same behavior
  as the Finder's, merely being displayed in another context.

  Finally, there has been some misleading talk with regard to the
  fact that the file in question is an executable - it is a shell
  script, and its executable permissions are set so that when it
  is opened by the Terminal the script runs. That there is such
  a thing as a double-clickable executable shell script is nothing
  new; any text file with a .command extension and executable
  permissions will run in the Terminal when double-clicked, and
  this has always been true. (You might reasonably argue that it
  shouldn't be true, and you might also not have been aware of the
  fact that it is true; that's a different issue, which I'll come
  back to in a moment.) And the fact that an executable can be
  communicated as a compressed file is nothing new either; were this
  not so, it would be impossible to send someone else a compressed
  application. Some reports have stressed the fact that the file has
  no "shebang" line, but that is a red herring; the exploit works
  equally well whether or not the shebang line is present.


**Conclusions** -- My conclusion has two parts, and they both
  amount to an assertion that computer files, as Iago says of men,
  "should be what they seem, or being not, would that they might
  seem none."

  In the first place, Mac OS X has never fully rationalized its
  complex scheme of document-application association, and now we
  see that there is in fact a bug in that scheme. Apple needs to get
  this straightened out, on the double, so that a file always looks
  like what it is.

  Secondly, an executable, of whatever sort - from a Cocoa
  application bundle to a lowly executable shell script - is a
  very special kind of file, and it needs to be marked as such.
  Data that you read and code that you run are both files, but
  they are crucially different kinds of file; so executables should
  look and behave specially. Any file which, if merely opened,
  will itself run as code, should be "badged" in some prominent
  and suggestive manner. It might also help if the first opening
  of every executable were preceded by an alert. Apple did institute
  something like this after the URL scheme debacle, but they didn't
  go far enough - an alert appears the first time you launch an
  application by double-clicking one of its documents, but not the
  first time you open the executable itself - whereas the entire
  problem, as we now see, is that you might not even know that
  this _is_ an executable. This, when Apple fixes things so that
  executables can't be disguised as JPEGs, will make the world
  a safer place.


iPhoto 6: Good, but Not Ground-Breaking
---------------------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  There are few programs whose capabilities I'm more familiar with
  than iPhoto, thanks to the feature-by-feature investigations I run
  through every year when writing my "iPhoto for Mac OS X: Visual
  QuickStart Guide" book. As a result, it's always fascinating to
  see what Steve Jobs demos when he unveils a new version of the
  program, as he did with iPhoto 6 during his most recent Macworld
  Expo San Francisco keynote. But as much as I'm usually dying to
  try the new features, I'm also desperately curious to see if Apple
  has changed any of the age-old annoyances in iPhoto. The last
  few releases haven't helped much on the annoyance front, but
  I'm pleased to say that iPhoto 6 tackles four of them, while
  unfortunately ignoring two others and introducing new ones.
  But first, let's look at some of the slick new features in
  iPhoto 6, which fall into two main categories: editing and
  sharing capabilities.

<http://www.apple.com/ilife/iphoto/>


**Editing Enhancements** -- iPhoto has long had three modes in
  which you could edit photos: within the display pane, in a
  separate window, and in an external editor such as Photoshop
  Elements. To that collection Apple has added full screen editing,
  in which iPhoto's interface disappears entirely, and the photo
  being edited appears at the largest possible size on the screen;
  a thumbnail pane appears at the top and a toolbar pane is at
  the bottom, both of which automatically appear and disappear like
  the Dock when you have Dock Hiding turned on. Full-screen editing,
  which you can set as your default action upon double-clicking
  an image, is extremely welcome, since iPhoto's other interface
  elements often took up a lot of space that would have been better
  used for the image, and iPhoto's separate editing window never
  remembered its size or position.

  The full-screen mode does require a few changes to familiar
  interface elements. For instance, if you click the Info button,
  a transparent Info panel appears (since there's nowhere for the
  normal Info pane to display). And if you zoom in, a transparent
  Navigation panel appears to help you scroll around in the image,
  since there aren't any scroll bars (but a scroll wheel can still
  scroll the image up or down; press Shift to scroll left or right
  with the scroll wheel). My main complaint about full-screen
  editing is that taking over the entire screen takes additional
  time; on my dual 1 GHz Power Mac G4, I have to wait roughly 4
  seconds before I can edit a photo in full-screen mode as opposed
  to 2 seconds in the main display pane. Plus, if you have two
  monitors and accidentally click outside of the full-screen view,
  iPhoto immediately returns you to organize mode, without saving
  any changes.

  Although the Adjust panel remains the same from iPhoto 5, a new
  Effects panel with a 3 by 3 grid of buttons assimilates the B & W
  (black-and white) and Sepia buttons, offering six additional
  effects that you can apply to the current photo, along with a
  ninth button that lets you revert to the original look. The
  Antique effect looks much like the Sepia effect, but is a little
  less saturated and more elegant. The Fade Color and Boost Color
  buttons seem to work roughly the same as the Saturation slider in
  the Adjust panel, removing and adding color intensity. And then
  the three buttons in the bottom row of the grid all apply an oval
  mask to the image, letting the photo show through in the middle.
  Matte creates a white mask, Vignette uses a black mask, and Edge
  Blur blurs the photo underneath the mask. Apart from B & W, Sepia,
  and Original, you can click each of the buttons in the Effects
  panel multiple times to apply it in increasing amounts. You can
  also click different buttons to apply their effects additively;
  for instance, making a photo sepia, fading the color, and applying
  a vignette mask. I can't yet tell if I'll end up using the new
  effects, but it's a little surprising that Apple didn't include
  all of the effects in Photo Booth. And I'd really like to see
  someone figure out how make all of the Mac OS X Core Image effects
  available within iPhoto - BeLight Software's free ImageTricks
  provides them as a standalone application.

<http://www.belightsoft.com/products/imagetricks/overview.php>

  The addition of all these transparent panels creates one new
  annoyance. Although you can see through them, they still get in
  the way, making a second monitor especially welcome for storage.
  Once they're placed on a second screen, iPhoto remembers their
  positions for the session, but unfortunately fails at that task
  between launches for the Effects and Adjust panels.

  There's one more significant aspect to full-screen mode that's
  truly welcome: the capability to compare up to eight photos at
  once. Clicking the Compare button while already in full-screen
  mode displays the current photo and the next one side-by-side at
  their largest possible sizes. But if you select up to eight photos
  in organize mode and click the full screen button, iPhoto displays
  them all as large as possible in full-screen mode. You can click
  on one and use the arrow keys to display the next or previous
  image that's not currently showing; more interestingly, you can
  use all the edit tools on each image or even delete the current
  one by pressing the Delete key. Comparing images thus becomes a
  great way to scan through your photos after import to see which
  ones are worth keeping; that's especially true if you use your
  camera's burst mode to capture fast action shots.


**Because It's Nice to Share** -- The other place Apple
  significantly enhanced iPhoto is in the sharing tools. The photo
  books that were iPhoto's marquee feature from the beginning have
  been improved, with new themes, higher quality printing, and lower
  prices. You can also click a Play button when creating a book to
  display it as a slideshow. But what's really neat is that books
  have spawned two new forms of print output: cards and calendars,
  both of which are laid out in very much the same way as a book.

  Cards come in two formats: folded greeting cards and postcards.
  Greeting cards hold a single image on the cover, with text on one
  of the inside panels. Postcards can have one image on the front,
  with the back holding either a normal text block or the standard
  outline for an address and stamp. They're as simple to create as
  you would expect, since the only options are the image to use,
  the text you enter, and the typefaces you choose (assuming you
  want to override the defaults). Multiple designs and backgrounds
  are available for each them. Pricing ranges between $1 and $2
  per card, depending on card type and number ordered.

  Calendars are more flexible. Along with the usual slew of themes
  and page designs within each theme, each changing depending on
  the number of photos showing, you can also drag photos to any
  day, making it simple to, for instance, put a portrait of family
  members on their birthdays. You can even add the photo title as
  a caption, but you must choose an adjacent box for the caption;
  it can't overlay the photo itself. You can also add any text
  you want to a particular day. iPhoto can create calendars of
  between 12 and 24 months, add national holidays from more than
  30 countries (exclusively, unfortunately, so you can't have both
  U.S. and Australian holidays both showing), import calendars from
  iCal (a workaround for the national holiday exclusivity, perhaps),
  and show birthdays imported from Address Book. The calendars are
  gorgeous and are priced at $20 for 12 months, with each additional
  month at $1.50.

  Steve Jobs made much of iPhoto's new photocasting feature in his
  Macworld Expo keynote, and it's an interesting feature. The basic
  goal is to enable iPhoto users to share photos - via a .Mac
  account - with people using either iPhoto 6 or a photo-capable RSS
  reader (like Safari). Photocasts must start from normal albums,
  not smart albums, but you can have them automatically update when
  the album changes. Photocasts can be accessible either to anyone
  or to just those to whom you provide the necessary username and
  password, but it doesn't seem as though Apple is publishing public
  photocasts in any sort of a directory, so realistically, it's
  unlikely that anyone would learn the URL to a photocast unless
  they were told by someone else.

  Although I'm not a particular devotee of the popular photo-sharing
  site Flickr (where do people find the time to look at photos from
  random netizens?), others have put some effort into making Flickr
  RSS feeds appear in iPhoto (choose File > Subscribe to Photocast
  and paste in a URL). Frankly, the connection between the two still
  seems tenuous, but check out the sites linked below for proxy
  services that provide iPhoto with more than 10 images at once and
  the largest possible photos from Flickr based on usernames, sets,
  and tags (Photocastr worked the best in my testing).

<http://photocastr.com/>
<http://snosrap.com/photocast/>
<http://phlikr.3xi.org/>

  Photocast albums are just plain weird. You can't search in them
  or edit photos in them, and even more oddly, you can't move a
  photo from a photocast album to your Library. However, you can
  move the photo to a normal album or use it in a calendar or book,
  and having done that, you can edit it. But it still doesn't appear
  in your Library. The only way to have photocast photos appear
  in your Library is to delete the photocast album; iPhoto saves
  all the photos you've "used" and prompts you to save the rest
  by importing them into your Library at that point (and deleting
  photocast albums crashes iPhoto 6.0.1 about half the time for me).
  It remains to be seen just how popular photocasting within
  iPhoto 6 will become.

  Other changes in the ways you share photos using iPhoto include
  the replacement of the .Mac HomePage integration with a connection
  to iWeb and a Zoom and Crop option when printing standard sized
  or full page prints (it essentially does the necessary cropping
  to get a photo into the right aspect ratio).


**Annoyances, Real and Imagined, Fixed and Extant** -- At this
  point in time, Apple's inability to fix what seem to be blatant
  problems with iPhoto has me almost questioning my judgment:
  am I the only one who thinks these irritations are worth fixing?
  Apparently the clamor hasn't been loud enough to jog Apple into
  action, especially since I wouldn't think any of these problems
  are at all subtle or difficult to resolve.

  Most shockingly, iPhoto 6 still forces you to title photos and
  film rolls by typing in the Title field of the Info pane or
  panel. I've been incredulous for years that the iPhoto team seems
  incapable of learning from the Finder that it would be far more
  obvious and easier if you could double-click the title of the
  photo or film roll as showing, and rename it in place, just like
  in the Finder and everywhere else in the Macintosh interface.

  I also remain surprised that no one within Apple has seen fit
  to make iPhoto more powerful than the Image Capture utility that
  ships with Mac OS X, at least when it comes to importing only a
  select set of photos from a camera, rather than all of them at
  once. Image Capture has had selective import since the early days
  of Mac OS X, so why is it that iPhoto, after five years, has been
  incapable of mimicking this obvious feature? (And while we're
  on the topic of Image Capture, wouldn't it make sense to enable
  iPhoto to control the "hot plug action" preference that launches
  a particular program when a camera is plugged in, rather than
  forcing people to hunt around for Image Capture to change it?)

  On the positive side, Apple has done away with some truly
  unnecessary annoyances. Most notable among these is a preference
  in the Advanced pane of iPhoto's Preferences window that enables
  you to import photos into iPhoto from a folder on your hard disk
  without copying the originals of those photos into the iPhoto
  Library folder. People have been whinging about the way iPhoto
  takes over imported photos since iPhoto 1.0, and now, five years
  later, Apple has finally ceded the point. Arguably, relatively
  few serious iPhoto users have managed to hold out and maintain
  a separate folder hierarchy in the Finder for original photos,
  making the feature a half-hearted concession, but I'm sure some
  will still appreciate it immensely. One note; although original
  photos remain in their original folders, modified photos are
  stored within the iPhoto Library folder's hierarchy.

  Speaking of the way iPhoto stores files on disk, that too has
  changed. Many people were thrown by the year-month-day folder
  approach taken by previous versions of iPhoto, so with iPhoto 6,
  Apple flattened the structure. Now there are three top-level
  folders in the iPhoto Library folder: Originals (for original
  photos), Modified (for edited photos), and Data (for thumbnails).
  Within each one are folders for each year, and within each year
  folder are folders for each film roll, named for that film roll
  (photos inside the film roll folders retain their original names;
  titles applied within iPhoto still exist only inside iPhoto).
  iPhoto 6 deletes the old hierarchy after upgrading your iPhoto
  Library to the new technique; however in the various upgrades
  I've performed, it has missed a number of photos and offered
  to "recover" them after the rest of the upgrade process is done.
  Take it up on that offer, since in my 10,000-image library,
  there were about 50 photos that needed recovery, and about 35
  of them were not duplicates (search manually on the filename,
  using iPhoto's Search field).

  Another common complaint was that iPhoto could print contact
  sheets of photos, but had no option for including the photo
  titles, making the contact sheets almost entirely useless for
  the traditional functions of contact sheets. That's now fixed;
  a checkbox toggles titles on and off, and you can choose the
  font used.

  Last, but by no means least, Apple fixed another glaring
  mistake related to entering text in books. Although iPhoto has
  been a Cocoa application from day one, and has always supported
  Mac OS X's built-in spelling checker, the Check Spelling As You
  Type option has always been off, and, if you turned it on while
  entering text in a book, it has maddeningly always turned itself
  off again once you switch pages or leave book mode. No longer;
  Check Spelling As You Type is now on by default, as it should be,
  and works wherever you enter text in books, cards, and calendars.


**Should You Upgrade?** Whenever I look at a new version of
  iPhoto, I'm considering the question of whether or not the
  improvements make it worth upgrading to the latest version
  of iLife. iPhoto 6 provides enough improvements and new
  features that anyone who uses iPhoto at all seriously will
  find them worthwhile, particularly if any of the other
  iLife '06 applications are of interest. That said, if you
  don't edit photos within iPhoto, and you don't plan to order
  books, cards, or calendars, the new features in iPhoto 6 may
  not be worth $80 on their own; iPhoto 6 simply isn't all that
  different from iPhoto 5 in truly important ways.


Take Control News/27-Feb-06
---------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

**"Take Control of Podcasting on the Mac" Covers GarageBand 3** --
  Podcasting took 2005 by storm, but as many people quickly
  realized, it's harder than it sounds. That's why we released
  "Take Control of Podcasting on the Mac" last year and why Apple,
  in a move that wasn't surprising, added a slew of podcasting-
  related features to GarageBand 3. But as anyone who has used
  Apple's iLife applications knows, their documentation is sparse,
  which makes us particularly pleased that Andy Affleck has updated
  "Take Control of Podcasting on the Mac" to cover using GarageBand
  2 or 3 to make a podcast. The ebook still covers Rogue Amoeba's
  Audio Hijack Pro, of course (and comes with a coupon worth $3
  off the program), and adds coverage of SoundStudio 3. Also new
  in this update is information about adding chapters to a podcast.
  The update is free to those who purchased the 1.0 version; just
  click the Check for Updates button on the first page of your copy
  of the ebook to download the update. For anyone who hasn't yet
  scratched the podcasting itch, "Take Control of Podcasting on
  the Mac" costs only $10 and will help you make the most of that
  shiny new copy of GarageBand 3.

<http://www.takecontrolbooks.com/podcasting-mac.html?14@@!pt=
TRK-0029-TB818-TCNEWS>


Hot Topics in TidBITS Talk/27-Feb-06
------------------------------------
  by TidBITS Staff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  The first link for each thread description points to the
  traditional TidBITS Talk interface; the second link points to
  the same discussion on our Web Crossing server, which provides
  a different look and which may be faster.


**DVD audio into iTunes?** How do you record a snippet of audio
  directly from a DVD? Read on to learn several different methods.
  (6 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2902>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/739/>


**SMS Text Messaging Costs** -- Some folks in the United States
  pay more to send a text message from their cell phones that it
  would costs to make a call. How does this compare in other markets
  around the world? (8 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2903>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/740/>


**iPod nano as external storage device for beige G3 Macs running
  OS 9.2.2?** Is it possible to use an iPod nano as a USB storage
  device for two Macs that aren't running Mac OS X? (2 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2904>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/741/>


**Mac OS X 10.4.5 Fixes PowerBook Stuttering** -- Lost in the
  details of the most recent Mac OS X Tiger update is a fix for an
  annoying problem where audio input would go into a feedback loop.
  (2 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2906>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/742/>


**Are Input Managers the Work of the Devil?** Matt Neuburg's
  article last week detailing the exploit used by the Leap-A malware
  prompts discussion of the scope of the problem. (6 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2907>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/743/>


**Shell script exploit** -- TidBITS readers look at the latest
  security threat and whether Web browsers other than Safari are
  vulnerable. (16 messages)

<http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tlkthrd=2908>
<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/744/>



$$

 Non-profit, non-commercial publications may reprint articles if
 full credit is given. Others please contact us. We don't guarantee
 accuracy of articles. Caveat lector. Publication, product, and
 company names may be registered trademarks of their companies.

 For information: how to subscribe, where to find back issues,
 and more, see <http://www.tidbits.com/>. TidBITS ISSN 1090-7017.
 Send comments and editorial submissions to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Back issues available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/>
 And: <ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/issues/>
 Full text searching available at: <http://www.tidbits.com/search/>
 -------------------------------------------------------------------




--
If you want to unsubscribe or change your address, use this link
http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx?unsub@@.3c557dc4!u=306a67f9

Reply via email to