TidBITS#844/28-Aug-06
=====================
  Issue link: <http://db.tidbits.com/issue/844>

  After nearly 600 issues, Technical Editor Geoff Duncan is ceasing
  day-to-day work with TidBITS. In a farewell article, he looks back
  on his years with TidBITS and how computer technology has evolved
  while still failing to make the need for support and explanation
  obsolete. Also in this issue, we look at Apple's busy week recalling
  1.8 million iBook G4 and PowerBook G4 batteries, paying $100 million
  to settle a lawsuit with Creative Technologies, and issuing a
  careful denial of a MacBook Wi-Fi security exploit. Plus, Adam notes
  Google's displeasure at being verbed, as well as the release of our
  latest ebook, "Take Control of Booking a Cheap Airline Ticket," and
  a new program to make Take Control titles extremely affordable for
  classroom use.

Articles
    DealBITS Drawing: Business Card Composer
    Apple Recalling 1.8 Million Laptop Batteries
    Apple Settles with Creative for $100 Million
    Apple Issues Careful Wi-Fi Exploit Denial
    Google Unhappy at Being Verbed
    The More Things Change...
    Take Control News/28-Aug-06
    Hot Topics in TidBITS Talk/28-Aug-06


------------ This issue of TidBITS sponsored in part by: --------------

* READERS LIKE YOU! Support TidBITS with a contribution today!
  <http://www.tidbits.com/about/support/contributors.html>
  Special thanks this week to Gordon Shapiro, Nichola Collins,
  Dennis Taylor, and Jamey Dumas for their generous support!

* Make friends and influence people by sponsoring TidBITS!
  Put your company and products in front of tens of thousands of
  savvy, committed Macintosh users who actually buy stuff.
  For more information and rates, email <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

* SMALL DOG ELECTRONICS: Save on Apple-refurbished AirPort
  Extreme Base Stations! Dial-up modem, Ethernet, antenna port,
  one year warranty - $145 w/ FREE 3-day express shipping!
  Visit: <http://www.smalldog.com/tb> -- 800-511-MACS

* FETCH SOFTWORKS: Fetch 5.1 makes FTP and SFTP easy!
  Upload, download, mirror, and manage your Web site. Dozens of
  new features to make file transfers easier and more reliable.
  Get your free trial version at <http://fetchsoftworks.com/>

* Web Crossing, Inc: Web Crossing offers integrated collaboration
  tools with a broad spectrum of functionality, but did you know
  adding discussions, blogs, podcasts, chat, polls, and calendars
  is point-click easy? Try a demo! <http://www.webcrossing.com/>

* Yojimbo 1.2 from Bare Bones Software: Your effortless, reliable
  information organizer for Mac OS X. It will change your life,
  without changing the way you work. Download the demo or buy it
  today! <http://www.barebones.com/products/yojimbo/>

* Circus Ponies NoteBook: Get organized, in two easy steps!
  De-clutter your Desktop. Organize your Web clippings. Manage
  your projects.  Voice annotate your notes. With NoteBook, it's
  simple. Try it free for 30 days. <http://www.circusponies.com/>

* MARK/SPACE, INC: Connecting the coolest gadgets from Dell,
  Garmin, HP, HTC, Motorola, Palm, Samsung, Sony and others to
  Mac OS X. Address Book, iCal, iPhoto, iTunes and more. See
  what you've been missing! <http://www.markspace.com/bits>

---------- Help support TidBITS by supporting our sponsors ------------


DealBITS Drawing: Business Card Composer
----------------------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8652>

  Creating a good business card is an interesting task, since you
  simply must include certain pieces of information, and you have an
  extremely limited space in which to do so, all while trying to make
  your business card stand out from the pack. We've made business
  cards in a variety of programs over the years, but one that stood
  out recently is BeLight Software's Business Card Composer[1], the
  previous version of which Joe Kissell used to create his TidBITS and
  Take Control business cards[2]. It's a slick application, and in
  version 4.0, BeLight Software added more than 100 new designs;
  provided a Merge Image feature for bringing images in from Address
  Book, iPhoto, and the Finder; added support for adjustable shadows;
  and improved the text editing features.

[1]<http://www.belightsoft.com/products/composer/overview.php>
[2]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/8488>

  In this week's DealBITS drawing, then, you can enter to win one of
  three copies of Business Card Composer 4.0[3], each worth $34.95.
  Entrants who aren't among our lucky winners will receive a discount
  on purchasing Business Card Composer, so be sure to enter at the
  DealBITS page linked below. All information gathered is covered by
  our comprehensive privacy policy[4]. Be careful with your spam
  filters, since you must be able to receive email from my address to
  learn if you've won. Remember too, that if someone you refer to this
  drawing wins, you'll receive the same prize as a reward for
  spreading the word.

[3]<http://www.tidbits.com/dealbits/business-card-composer/>
[4]<http://www.tidbits.com/about/privacy.html>


Apple Recalling 1.8 Million Laptop Batteries
--------------------------------------------
  by Jeff Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8653>

  Apple last week announced a voluntary recall of 1.8 million iBook G4
  and PowerBook G4 batteries[5] due to potential overheating issues.
  The affected lithium-ion batteries were manufactured by Sony and are
  related to the batteries recently recalled by Dell (see "Dell
  Recalls 4.1 Million Batteries,"[6] 21-Aug-06). The batteries were
  sold between October 2003 and August 2006. Affected batteries
  include:

[5]<https://support.apple.com/ibook_powerbook/batteryexchange/>
[6]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/8645>

* 12-inch iBook G4, battery model number A1061, and serial number
  ranges of ZZ338-ZZ427, 3K429-3K611, and 6C519-6C552 (ending with
  S9WA, S9WC or S9WD).

* 12-inch PowerBook G4, battery model number A1079, and serial number
  ranges of ZZ411-ZZ427 and 3K428-3K611.

* 15-inch PowerBook G4, battery model numbers A1078 and A1148, and
  serial number ranges of 3K425-3K601, 6N530-6N551 (ending with THTA,
  THTB, or THTC), and 6N601 (ending with THTC).

  If you own an affected battery, Apple recommends that you stop using
  it immediately (the laptop can run from its power cord without a
  battery) and order a replacement from the Battery Exchange Program
  iBook G4 and PowerBook G4[7] Web page. The program is being managed
  only through the Web site, so don't take a battery to an Apple Store
  or authorized retailer. Apple claims a 4 to 6 week turnaround for
  receiving a new battery.

  Since the announcement, some people have had trouble with Apple's
  Web form, mostly with serial numbers that fall within the published
  range not being acknowledged. According to some reports, attempts
  that failed on the first few days after the announcement have
  subsequently worked as Apple fixes the bugs in the form-checking
  code. If you're still not having any luck, you can also call
  Apple[8] and see if a person can accept the number manually. Note
  that not all batteries within the published ranges were made by
  Sony, and thus aren't affected (this might account for the
  more-specific "ending with" phrases now included).

[8]<http://www.apple.com/support/contact/phone_contacts.html>

  According to information posted by the United States Consumer
  Product Safety Commission[9], "Apple has received nine reports of
  batteries overheating, including two reports of minor burns from
  handling overheated computers and other reports of minor property
  damage. No serious injuries were reported."

[9]<http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml06/06245.html>

  Sony expects the Dell and Apple battery recalls to cost between $172
  million and $258 million, and even if the recall doesn't hurt
  Apple's bottom line, it's still a distraction and potential
  reputation hit with people who don't realize the fault lies with
  Sony.


Apple Settles with Creative for $100 Million
--------------------------------------------
  by Geoff Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8654>

  Removing a dark cloud from the future of its now-iconic iPod music
  players, Apple Computer has announced it will pay Creative
  Technologies $100 million[10] to settle all legal disputes between
  the companies. The payment grants Apple a paid-up license to use
  Creative's so-called "Zen" patent in all Apple products; under the
  terms of the agreement, Apple can recoup some of the money if
  Creative is able to license the Zen patent to other parties.

[10]<http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2006/aug/23settlement.html>

  Creative filed suit against Apple[11] in May 2006, almost 10 months
  after having been granted a patent on the organization and
  navigation of music tracks on a portable device. Creative initially
  filed for the patent in January 2001, when it debuted its first
  Nomad and Zen music players. Apple introduced the first iPod in
  October 2001. However, Creative's claim took until August 2005 to
  wend its way through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

[11]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/8535>

  The settlement not only removes doubts from the future of the iPod
  line (as part of its suit, Creative was seeking to block the
  importation of iPods into the United States), but also saves
  Creative from a protracted and costly patent battle. In addition to
  having to prove its case against Apple, Apple had filed two salvos
  of suits accusing Creative of violating Apple patents. The
  settlement presumably lets the companies set aside all litigation,
  and - what's more - Apple gains a partner. Creative plans to join
  Apple's "Made for iPod" program and begin producing its own lines of
  iPod accessories later this year.


Apple Issues Careful Wi-Fi Exploit Denial
-----------------------------------------
  by Glenn Fleishman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8655>

  Apple public relations director Lynn Fox says that the Wi-Fi exploit
  demonstrated by David Maynor and Jon Ellch two weeks ago in a video
  shown at the Black Hat 2006 conference does not represent a flaw in
  Apple's software or device firmware (see "Wireless Driver Hack Could
  Target Macs and Windows"[12], 07-Aug-06). Apple told Macworld[13]
  and many other media outlets that the demonstrated exploit uses a
  third-party wireless driver for a Wi-Fi USB adapter. Neither the
  driver nor the chips are the same as those used by Apple in Mac OS X
  on a MacBook.

[12]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/8628>
[13]<http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/08/17/wirelesshack/>

  Further, Fox said that Apple has received neither code nor a
  demonstration that shows a flaw in shipping hardware and software.
  The researchers have changed the message[14] on the page at
  SecureWorks, the consulting site at which they provide services, to
  clarify that Apple code wasn't involved in their demonstration.
  Chipmaker Atheros also issued a statement - to Brian Krebs at
  Security Fix[15] - that their products apparently aren't at risk,
  either, based on what they knew at the time that they issued that
  statement.

[14]<http://www.secureworks.com/newsandevents/blackhatcoverage.html>
[15]<http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/08/update_on_the_apple_macbook_cl.html>

  The two researchers who presented the hack say that a flaw in the
  way in which wireless drivers from several manufacturers hand off
  data to the operating system can allow exploits in which a machine
  can be compromised to execute arbitrary code. That arbitrary code
  could then allow an affected system to grant root, or system
  ownership, access to the computer. In July, Intel released a patch
  for their Centrino Wi-Fi adapters found in laptops from many
  manufacturers that fixes such a problem, although Maynor and Ellch
  said that this fix wasn't a result of their work.

  With that level of access, a cracker could install "bot" software
  that's used to turn affected computers into remotely activated
  warriors in the spam or denial-of-service wars. Bots are now
  considered the biggest single problem on the Internet because
  millions of computers can be activated, like sleeper cells, whenever
  an attack is desired.

  A small firestorm of responses have appeared since Apple's denial,
  hinging on two factors: some writers and bloggers have been
  presented with information by Maynor and Ellch that is not yet in
  the public sphere of knowledge, and Apple's denial of the exploit is
  extremely carefully crafted.

  My take at the moment is that it's highly possible that Maynor and
  Ellch have found a security flaw in the built-in MacBook and MacBook
  Pro Wi-Fi drivers that, at the point that Apple made their statement
  about not seeing any "evidence" of an exploit, they had not yet
  presented to Apple. In this scenario, Maynor and Ellch accidentally
  provided details to Brian Krebs before they meant to, and are
  remaining mum until Apple responds. We'll see.

  You can read many takes on this subject: George Ou at ZDNet[16] (who
  has received private information), John Gruber at Daring
  Fireball[17] (who has not), security expert Rich Mogull's personal
  blog[18] (he has been disclosed), Wi-Fi expert Jim Thompson[19] (who
  tears the exploit apart limb by limb, fingernail by fingernail) and
  John Moltz at Crazy Apple Rumors Site[20] (who makes stuff up).

[16]<http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/>
[17]<http://daringfireball.net/2006/08/curious_case>
[18]<http://securosis.com/2006/08/21/another-take-on-the-mac-wireless-hack/>
[19]<http://www.smallworks.com/archives/00000465.htm>
[20]<http://www.crazyapplerumors.com/?p=667>


Google Unhappy at Being Verbed
------------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8656>

  A few months ago, I wrote about how editors of the Oxford English
  Dictionary and the Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary were adding
  "Google" to their dictionaries as a verb (see "Google Becomes a
  Verb"[21], 10-Jul-06). In it, I noted that trademark lawyers (at
  least those at Google) probably wouldn't be happy about this event
  since it dilutes the Google trademark, even though it's essentially
  free advertising for Google. The concern is, of course, that if a
  trademark becomes used generically, the trademark owner loses the
  ability to protect it.

[21]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/8598>

  How right I was. According to a short blip in The Independent[22],
  Google is now sending nasty-grams to media organizations - though
  not us, yet - to warn them about using its name as a verb. Other
  sites have picked up the news, but as is often the case with the
  close-mouthed Google, little hard information has emerged. Google
  has confirmed sending the letters, saying in one instance, "We think
  it's important to make the distinction between using the word Google
  to describe using Google to search the internet, and using the word
  Google to describe searching the internet. It has some serious
  trademark issues."

[22]<http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article1218805.ece>

  Perhaps the most interesting coverage I found by googling for
  "Google verb legal letters" comes from a posting by Frank Abate[23]
  on the American Dialect Society Mailing List, in which he claims
  that Google can't really do anything to people using "google" as a
  verb because U.S. trademark law explicitly excludes proprietary
  rights in verbs (and nouns, as opposed to proper adjectives).
  Although I found plenty of support[24] for the fact that "proper"
  usage of trademarks involves using them as proper adjectives ("a
  Xerox photocopier"), I couldn't confirm that a company would be on
  shaky legal ground if trying to prevent usage of a trademark as a
  noun or verb. But you know what's funny about Frank Abate's list
  posting? It's from February 2003. I guess Google has been prickly
  about being verbed for some time now. But they also haven't sued
  anyone for it yet, as far as I've seen.

[23]<http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0302D&L=ads-l&P=R2823>
[24]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark>


The More Things Change...
-------------------------
  by Geoff Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8657>

  Way back in 1994, Adam and Tonya graciously welcomed me to the
  TidBITS community by bringing me on board as TidBITS's managing
  editor[25]. Now after more than 5,000 articles, almost 600 issues,
  and nearly twelve years, it's time to bid a fond farewell: this
  piece marks my final appearance in TidBITS as a regular staff
  member.

[25]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/1705>

  I realize many readers have only a fuzzy idea of my roles at TidBITS
  over the years - or no idea at all. That's understandable: although
  I've written more than 750 items and articles for TidBITS, the bulk
  of my work has been behind the scenes. At first, I worked with
  external authors to get material into shape, helped edit stories,
  and generally pushed TidBITS forward. Eventually, I took over
  distributing TidBITS issues - that used to involve a couple hours
  engaged in battle with quaint devices called modems, uploading to
  commercial online services, bulletin boards, and eventually
  publishing on a newfangled thing called the Web. Up until a couple
  weeks ago, I helped edit, produced, and distributed essentially
  every issue of TidBITS since mid-1995, and my real-life
  acquaintances know these tasks have made my Mondays sacrosanct,
  well, _forever_. I also got to know many TidBITS readers and
  subscribers by way of handling editorial email for many years:
  responding to comments and questions, forwarding material along to
  other staff members, and handling subscription problems and queries
  from readers. In case you didn't know already, TidBITS's readers are
  a fine bunch.

  Eventually I slipped into a role more involved in supporting and
  developing TidBITS services and projects. This probably started with
  the first incarnation of DealBITS[26], but took root when TidBITS
  took over management of its mailing lists from Rice University back
  in 1996, for which we had to create our own subscription management
  system[27]. (At the time, no Mac-based mailing list software could
  handle TidBITS.) Adam mostly dealt with the server side of things; I
  dealt with the databases and the programming. With some expansions
  to enable new lists and bounce processing, that system ran until
  TidBITS migrated mailing services to Web Crossing[28] in 2004, and
  it offered features which (to my knowledge) still aren't available
  in any commercially available mailing list management software.

[26]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/1306>
[27]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/4761>
[28]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/7930>

  I didn't realize it at the time, but the point where I crossed the
  line from a regular "face of TidBITS" to being more of a "back room
  geek" was probably when Adam and Tonya took a month-long trip to
  Australia[29] in 1998. Adam had held a contest[30] to come up with a
  full-text search engine for TidBITS, but, as much as the winning
  software solved our search problem, keeping that software running -
  on a server in Adam and Tonya's basement, at the top of a steep hill
  maybe 15 miles from my place - was a bit of an effort. I think it
  was on my third trip up there in the span of a week, spending hours
  hunched over the black-and-white monitor as the software laboriously
  re-indexed eight years of TidBITS issues, trying to keep warm by
  running up and down the stairs, entertaining Adam and Tonya's cat
  Cubbins, and blowing into my hands, that I first thought, "This
  would be simpler if the server was at my place." After all, I had
  better connectivity than Adam and Tonya did, and I was already
  riding herd on a Web robot I'd developed (which was running 24/7 on
  my old Quadras). Trying to baby-sit servers in two locations was
  just too much.

[29]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/4809>
[30]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/2175>

  And so began the descent into madness. A proof-of-concept TidBITS
  article database I'd halfway put together on a spare Mac was quickly
  pressed into service as a way to reference individual articles, but
  we then used it to generate content for the TidBITS Web site[31],
  and soon it was operating as a replacement for the failed full text
  search engine. At some point the server moved off my desk and into
  my office closet, and was joined by another server, and then
  another. Next we lashed an insidiously developed, Web-enabled
  archive for TidBITS Talk[32] into the system, and the server closet
  ballooned again. By 1999, the system was supporting polls, quizzes,
  between-issue news updates, sponsor banners, and reader
  contributions; publishing issues; generating email, and more. As we
  added features[33], we inevitably found much off-the-shelf software
  unsuitable, so I wound up writing POP, SMTP, HTTP, and XML-RPC
  clients plus security software from the ground up to support needed
  functions.

[31]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/4179>
[32]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/5012>
[33]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/5588>

  Over time, we fixed problems, added features (like a version of
  TidBITS for handheld devices[34] and an RSS feed), and I put a good
  deal of effort into trying to improve the systems' performance,
  staving off attackers, and learning to keep trawlers and
  increasingly aggressive Web robots under control. The setup
  weathered a 6.8 magnitude earthquake, but a few weeks later my ISP
  went dark[35] and - in a fit of irony - I packed TidBITS's most
  important pieces off to that same, chilly spot in Adam and Tonya's
  basement for a few weeks just before they relocated to Ithaca, New
  York[36]. With some additions and changes, that database and Web
  publishing system was driving TidBITS - and taking up a lot of my
  office closet space - until earlier this month.

[34]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/6193>
[35]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/6494>
[36]<http://db.tidbits.com/article/6452>

  Around that same period, two important things happened. First, I got
  pneumonia. Not run-of-the-mill, gosh-I-feel-awful pneumonia, but an
  antibiotic-resistant, atypical form which took off about 35 pounds
  in 20 days, put a baseball-sized abscess in one lung, and stayed
  with me for months. As a weight-loss plan it was hard to beat, but
  the illness did make me reassess a few things and realize that,
  despite the cozy heat emanating from the office closet, I wasn't
  very interested in being a "server monkey." Do I like to help design
  and build cool things? Sure! Do I like baby-sitting hardware and
  jumping to its rescue whenever Web crawlers swarm it like
  yellowjackets on jam? Not so much.

  Second, Apple launched Mac OS X. Despite having done a fair bit of
  software development and testing for various Unix derivations over
  the years, I have an irrational distaste for Unix. (To be sure, I
  can rationalize it: don't get me started.) As silly as it sounds,
  I've always found Unix inscrutable, ramshackle, ill-tempered, and
  suitable only for software developers. I didn't consider the
  "classic" Mac OS any paragon of usability or transparency either
  (again, don't get me started), but with Mac OS X, I felt Apple
  finally abandoned a key - albeit abstract - goal to bring the
  advantages of computing to everyday people in a way they could use,
  manage, and maintain without becoming rocket scientists. Of course,
  other computer manufacturers and operating system developers haven't
  made much progress on that front either, but Apple used to try to
  make "computers for the rest of us." With Mac OS X, Apple
  essentially put a patina over parts of an arcane, byzantine
  collection of technologies and called it innovation. In my book,
  that's not "computers for the rest of us," but "computers just like
  all the rest." But I waited and hoped.

  I understand the technical and market forces which led to Mac OS X
  and which continue to drive its development, and I certainly don't
  begrudge folks who like Mac OS X, love it, or embrace its Unix
  underpinnings. Truthfully, I feel Mac OS X has a lot to commend it,
  as modern operating systems go. However, I don't think modern
  operating systems are anything much to crow about, and, despite a
  few years of trying, I haven't been able to bring myself to enjoy
  Apple's Aqua-flavored Kool-Aid.

  Since I first started using computers - a 4K Commodore PET at the
  age of 11, followed by an Apple IIc and an early VAX running a
  Version 7 Unix - I've lamented that the technology wasn't ready for
  prime time. The main reason I got into technical writing - then
  software testing, then development, consulting, editing, TidBITS,
  and Internet-based projects - was because it wasn't simple enough to
  make computers do what I wanted. Instead, I found myself fiddling,
  fixing, explaining, programming, enabling, and helping other people.
  I believed in the potential of information technology and felt I
  could make a positive contribution by helping other people tap into
  it: the glitches and problems and stumbling blocks were just bumps
  in the road - growing pains, right? But when my mother retypes a
  document because she can't find the original, a TidBITS Talk thread
  deteriorates into a discussion of command line switches, I utterly
  destroy a brand-new Mac mini by clicking its Printer Sharing
  checkbox, a live music recording is ruined by an invisible
  background process, or a disabled friend feels she has no choice but
  to buy a new printer because her old one suddenly stopped working...
  I just want to scream. It's the twenty-first century: why are we
  still mired in this stuff?

  I've long said that we'll know computers have arrived when there's
  no need for people like me. The fact so many everyday people have to
  turn to interpreters, consultants, experts, classes, training, and
  technophiles to use their computers and put them to work, to me,
  represents a fundamental failure of the industry. It seems people
  like me will be needed for a long, long time. Many years ago,
  Microsoft held a press event to announce a significant expansion of
  the company's technical support offerings; the late technology
  writer Cary Lu scored a zinger - and made a profound point - by
  politely asking if Microsoft anticipated its products would one day
  reach a level where users would require _fewer_ support resources.
  Along the same lines, I remain flabbergasted Apple has installed
  Genius Bars in its retail stores. To me, Genius Bars don't say
  "Apple's your friend and is here to help!" but instead, "Everyone
  knows Apple makes the easiest-to-use computers, but only a genius
  can figure them out."

  So now that TidBITS has successfully migrated its services out of my
  closet, it's time for me to focus on projects more personally
  fulfilling than reading Apple's tea leaves, hoping the computing
  industry suddenly gets it right, or jumping and clapping on cue
  whenever the Internet's "next big thing" comes a-knocking. I don't
  plan to drop off the face of the earth: for the time being, I'll
  appear on TidBITS's virtual masthead as "Editor at Large" and I'll
  continue to contribute material to TidBITS as time and opportunity
  permit. But where, to me, the Macintosh used to represent a set of
  values and ideals about the role of technology in people's lives,
  now the Macintosh is just a computer. I need to treat it as such.

  I'd like to express my appreciation to the entire TidBITS staff -
  Joe Kissell, Glenn Fleishman, Matt Neuburg, Jeff Carlson, Mark
  Anbinder, and (of course!) Adam and Tonya - for their camaraderie,
  support, friendship, and (especially) humor over the years: they're
  a sterling group, and I can't recommend them highly enough. But,
  most importantly, I'd like to thank the TidBITS readership and
  community for welcoming us to your mailboxes and browsers for all
  these years: you represent what is truly the best thing about the
  Macintosh. Don't forget it!


Take Control News/28-Aug-06
---------------------------
  by Adam C. Engst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8658>

**New Ebook Helps You Book a Cheap Airline Ticket** -- Our latest
  ebook - Sam Sellers's "Take Control of Booking a Cheap Airline
  Ticket"[37] - is somewhat unusual, but we think it solves an
  important problem for anyone who needs to book a plane ticket but
  doesn't want to pay too much or waste time on futile Web searches.
  That's because it's easy to see a collection of airline ticket sites
  as modules in one big confusing application, and this ebook teaches
  you the best way to use that application to save time and money,
  while reducing frustration.

[37]<http://www.takecontrolbooks.com/airline-ticket.html?14@@!pt=TRK-0039-TB844-TCNEWS>

  Tonya and I recently ran into this problem when we wanted to book an
  open-jaw trip from Ithaca to San Francisco and then home again from
  Seattle. We spent hours hunting for a deal, had fares increase
  seemingly within minutes of our first search, and felt that we had
  to consult far too many sites before we found a good price. In
  short, we felt out of control. Next time, we'll know what to do
  because Sam's ebook explains exactly which sites to visit in the
  right order when booking plane tickets for trips originating within
  the United States. If you fly at all, we encourage you to try Sam's
  technique for finding the lowest available ticket prices; your
  savings on even a single flight will more than pay for the $10
  ebook!


**Discounted Class Copy Pricing Now Available** -- As an author, you
  know you've arrived when your work is required reading in a class,
  and that's something we're hoping to see more of with our Take
  Control ebooks. Over the years, we've received a number of inquiries
  from teachers who want to purchase copies of our ebooks to
  distribute to their students, but at full price, the cost was too
  high for most classes. Now, however, we're pleased to announce that
  - in order to make our ebooks more cost-effective as class materials
  - we have introduced special ultra-discounted pricing specifically
  for classes, whether taught at a college or university, in an Apple
  Store, by a Macintosh consultant, or in a K-12 or adult-education
  setting. Teachers can now buy our ebooks for distribution to up to
  10 students for what you would normally pay for only 2 copies
  (that's as much as 80-percent off); for more students, additional
  copies can be purchased in 10-student blocks. Once we've received
  payment, we'll create a custom-stamped version of each ebook for the
  teacher to distribute to students. Apart from the stamp, these
  ebooks are identical in every way to the normal versions we sell,
  including free minor updates. To learn more and apply for class-copy
  pricing for your class, visit our Take Control Class Copies
  page[38].

[38]<http://www.takecontrolbooks.com/class-copies.html>


Hot Topics in TidBITS Talk/28-Aug-06
------------------------------------
  by TidBITS Staff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  article link: <http://db.tidbits.com/article/8659>

**Last Tango Round the Mulberry Bush** -- Matt Neuburg's article about
  the email program Mulberry brings out supporters and questions the
  need for a bug-report mechanism for a program no longer in
  development. 6 messages[39]

[39]<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/925/>


**The Decline of WWDC** -- Attendees of Apple's Worldwide Development
  Conference debate the shortcomings of this year's show, based on
  Matt Neuburg's article from last week. 16 messages[40]

[40]<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/928/>


**Secure Transfer Using Civil Netizen and Pando** -- Glenn Fleishman's
  article on these two file-sharing applications brings up other
  services, such as Amazon's S3 and Tango DropBox Pro. 2 messages[41]

[41]<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/929/>


**Should I get a new scanner?** Is it worth trying to find a scanner
  with Intel-native drivers, or stick with your existing one? 5
  messages[42]

[42]<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/930/>


**Notification scheme for reducing spam** -- The peer-to-peer aspects
  of Civil Netizen and Pando prompt speculation on how such technology
  might be used to cut down spam. 7 messages[43]

[43]<http://emperor.tidbits.com/TidBITS/Talk/931/>


$$

This is TidBITS, a free weekly technology newsletter providing timely
news, insightful analysis, and in-depth reviews to the Macintosh and
Internet communities. Feel free to forward to friends; better still,
please ask them to subscribe!

Non-profit, non-commercial publications and Web sites may reprint or
link to articles if full credit is given. Others please contact us. We
do not guarantee accuracy of articles. Caveat lector. Publication,
product, and company names may be registered trademarks of their
companies. TidBITS ISSN 1090-7017.

Copyright 2006 TidBITS: Reuse governed by Creative Commons license.

Contact us at:    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TidBITS Web site: <http://www.tidbits.com/>
License terms:    <http://www.tidbits.com/terms/>
Full text search: <http://www.tidbits.com/search/>
Subscriptions:    <http://www.tidbits.com/about/list.html>
Account help:     <http://www.tidbits.com/about/account-help.html>


--
If you want to unsubscribe or change your address, use this link
http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx?unsub@@.3c557dc4!u=306a67f9

Reply via email to