> If you rely on plugins, they might not last forever and ever, > depending on what innovations browsers come up with. Would that be > correct to say, Eric? That would be one hiccup.
Are you talking about *brower* plugins (e.g., TiddlySnip, GreaseMonkey, etc)? Browser plugins are, of course, dependent upon the specific browser being used, and can definitely break when that browser is updated to a new version. However, inasmuch as TW plugins are just tiddlers containing javascript, they should continue work within the document in which they are installed (assuming they worked in the first place), as long as the brower continues to support javascript. > Also, the cookies > thing has been overcome for the moment, but who knows what similar > hiccups will come along. Cookies are used to store TW *settings*. While a loss of settings would revert to the defaults, a change cookie-based in settings would not actually prevent you from accessing the document content (though it might not look the same), and you can always redefine those settings, either with new cookies, or by assigning hard-coded values via a systemConfig tiddler. -e --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
