Hi, many thanks for giving TiddlyWeb a try and reporting on your experiences. Before I get to the meat of your message, I should say that TiddlyWeb is still a pre-version 1 application and as such has some rough edges, some bugs and is not as easy to install or manage as I would like it to someday be. Direct responses to your message below.
On Jan 8, 9:18 am, EduardWagner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, we are using tiddlywiki for internal documentation purpose for > about a year know and i will not miss it ever. Thank you so much for > this little working companion. As I noticed the possibilities of the > serverside tiddlyweb we were delighted and now we are going to let it > work. We installed the latest release 0.9.4 on a littele sparc machine > running sun solaris 10 and used both a python 2.4.4 and a 2.6.1 > version. Is Python 2.6.x working properly with TiddlyWeb? I've not tried it with 2.6 yet and thought there might be some issues. If things are running okay, that's great to know. > Installation is running without any problems. We can create an > instance called 'tw'. importing the three plugins from_svn is working > fine also. Importing a whole tiddlywiki file into a new bag works also > fine and creating new recipes is not a problem. Just didn't find out > how to upload pictures, but chris dent can do it proved > 'peermore.png'? There are still some tricky issues with that. The interface has not been solidified, and there is no client side (TiddlyWiki plugin) support, but the basic gist is as follows: * If you have a image file that you want to use * You may PUT that file to a tiddler URL with a Content-Type header of image/png or image/jpeg (or whatever type it is) * The server code will recognize that you are putting a weird content- type and base64 encode the content and store it to disk * When you use that tiddler in a TiddlyWiki, it will either show up as the image, or be a link back to the server. There are multiple implementations of how to do binary content in TiddlyWiki. The one currently in use with TiddlyWeb is unlikely to be the one that remains, so at this time I wouldn't recommend using it, unless it is just for exploration. > So we searched a bit and found Chris Dent's test installation at > 'peermore.com:8080' and tried another way. > We used the 'webadaptor' from the bag 'TiddlyWeb' and the plugins for > 'autosave' and 'source' and it works, you can edit a tiddler, create a > new one and sny to the web, even from a local file!!! But we don't > know if we can let it run like this due to stable prozessing . I'm not sure that plugins in place on the peermore.com:8080 site are the most recent. What might be happening is that the plugins you installed into your instance (with from_svn), depending on when you got them, are somewhat broken (they are in active development at the moment). What I suggest you do is run the from_svn command again to refresh your plugins with the very latest and see if the problem goes away. If it does not we'll need to do some closer investigation to see where thing are breaking. If your server is on a public IP I'm happy to have a look myself, or I can guide you through what to do. Feel free to respond here or contact me directly. Again, thank you very much for trying out TiddlyWeb. I'm glad it is almost working for you. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
