> Perhaps there is an issue if there are identical named tiddlers in > different bags but the TiddlyWebConfig in the System bag is the source > of all recipes?
Hi, we do have a lot of recipes now and each of them has it's own workspace bag, where we put the corresponding TiddlyWebConfig entry "server.workspace": "bags/ workspace" We don't have a TiddlyWebConfig in the system bag any more and so only one is loaded with the recipes bags. I don't now if there is a feature for multiple workspaces right now, there is a tiddlersourceplugin, but i don't now if it's obsolete now. @developers The key question from myself is: what was the reason for the bag- concept in filesystems? >From a "real real green green" user opinion the concept with extented tiddler fields and tags would have been more of a meta description (groupings of tiddlers in "virtual" bags with policies and things like that). What was the need of filesystem, was it due to performance of the wiki- generation or deployment needs, or ... Would be just interesting why the developers decided to go this way;) nevertheless it's working fine and fast for us now and i'm very glad you developed that tiddlyweb server. bye edi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
