On 13 Mrz., 21:30, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 11, 9:52 am, EduardWagner <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can think of several ideas, none of which are yet implemented that
> might be able to help the situation:
>
> * Instead of using documents served by the static plugin, instead use
> binary tiddlers: put the documents in Tiddlers[1].
> * Make a different static plugin that works like the existing one but
> instead of using a route of /static/{some stuff} make it /{anything}/
> static/{somestuff} and then use relative ./static links in your
> tiddlers.
> * Adjust the handling of the download=<filename> query intiddlyweb/
> web/sendtiddlers so rather then sending the raw tiddlywiki file it
> made an archive which included the necessary files from static.
>
> Of these the second is probably the easiest to make happen, but I'm
> not sure what the implications would be.
Hi Chris,
we found the AttachFilePlugin from tiddlytools.com
and adapted it a bit to work together with tiddlyweb,
now we can uload and store binary files as base64-encoded tiddlers.
It's amazing
Bye Edi
@eric: again thanks a lot for that great ressource!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
