Hi Saq, > As many of you are aware, there have been numerous discussions and attempts > at creating a "plugin repository" for TiddlyWiki in the past. However, for > various reasons, these attempts have fallen short of delivering something > usable by the community. Over the last few weeks - with the support of the > UnaMesa Association - I've been working on a new project called TiddlyHub > which addresses the same need: making it easier to find plugins. In > particular my focus has been on delivering a solution that meets the > immediate needs of the community and requires minimal maintenance to keep it > up to date. An early preview is available here:http://dev.squize.org/plugins/
Gee, forgot to say thank you for the work you put into this. Nicely done. . What makes me a bid sad is that TW itself, looking so promising with Fred's prototype (dysfunctional now, but still visible today: http://plugins.tiddlywiki.org/) - didn't made it to the production stage. Such a search machine would also have been the best advertisement for TW itself. What were the reason for dropping the TiddlyWeb route for this purpose? Inherent limitations of TiddlyWiki? - Or TiddlyWeb, which I nevertheless see advertised for multi-user-collaboration TWs. I'm asking this because sometimes a non-coder gets the impression nothing is impossible with a TW and a good developer. And if I failed in making something I envisioned, only so because I know nothing about programming. But if Fred with the support of BT wasn't able to - what could have been then the reasons for a failure? - Lack of time?? the very best wishes.. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
