Morris,
> I appreciate your willingness to work with a time system you don't > believe in. And your animosity toward base sixty is obvious, so I > appreciate it will take time before you are ready and open minded > enough to move much further into this project ;-) As I've said, I'm happy to help, and happy to "promote" the two systems on an equal basis going forward. If you need something more in TW, we can certainly talk about it. I'm confident the users (er, should there ever be any) can pick the one they want to work with. I suspect they will do so without invoking mystical ratios or ancient Babylon, but maybe that's just me. ;-) It's likely that no one will believe it at this point, but this isn't even a particular interest of mine... the illogic of the current system has always bothered me, but there are a great many subjects that I feel much more passionately about. The whole thing started just because I re-started my personal web page, and the "defense" of Swatch Internet Time that I wrote years ago was almost the only part of my old web page I could still find. If I'd known how much time it was going to absorb (or how few others seem interested), I might not have bothered. ;-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
